mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lin Jiapeng <ljp1205831794@gmail.com>
To: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	TencentOS Corvus AI <corvus@tencent.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Lin Jiapeng <jiapenglin@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: reuseport: avoid duplicate closed socket insertion
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 22:55:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c5e04a6-afba-4f7e-b790-c109ddad0318@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179397371960.488859.17332481477084448537@kernel.org>



On 2026-11-06 10:01 p.m., netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its
> commit messages seem to be missing some information:
> 
>   - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical
>     (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include
>     the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages.
> 
> Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead,
> reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers
> can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for
> other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages
> then.
> 
> The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think
> that is the case please reply and explain.


The issue was actually triggered, not found by code inspection.

Reproducer outline (unprivileged, uid 65534, inside a fresh user + network
namespace with net.ipv4.tcp_migrate_req = 1):

   1. Create two TCP listeners in the same SO_REUSEPORT group (one is kept
      hashed as an anchor).
   2. setsockopt(SO_REUSEPORT, 0) on one listener: sk_reuseport is cleared
      but sk_reuseport_cb stays attached.
   3. Repeat connect(AF_UNSPEC) + listen() 129 times on that socket. Each
      disconnect goes through inet_unhash() -> reuseport_stop_listen_sock(),
      which re-inserts the same socket into the closed section until
      num_closed_socks exceeds max_socks.
   4. The 129th insertion writes socks[-1], which overlaps reuse->prog on
      x86_64. Attaching a classic BPF filter with SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_CBPF
      on the other socket then consumes the struct sock pointer stored in
      reuse->prog as a struct bpf_prog *.

Kernel: v7.4-rc1 based tree (d68ce4e71248), x86_64, CONFIG_KASAN=y,
CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS=y, QEMU.

Symptoms, first the out-of-bounds write itself:

   UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in net/core/sock_reuseport.c:152:9
   index -1 is out of range for type 'struct sock *[] 
__counted_by(max_socks)'
   CPU: 0 UID: 65534 PID: 22 Comm: poc
   Call Trace:
    __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x91/0xa0
    reuseport_stop_listen_sock+0x290/0x310
    inet_unhash+0xd5/0x400
    tcp_set_state+0x125/0x260
    tcp_disconnect+0x47/0x1950
    __inet_stream_connect+0x2d0/0xab0
    __x64_sys_connect+0x71/0x80

then, after SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_CBPF is issued on the second listener, the
corrupted prog pointer reaches the RCU free path as a struct sock *:

   Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
   0xdffffc000000008e: 0000 [#1] KASAN
   KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000470-0x0000000000000477]
   RIP: 0010:call_rcu+0x10d/0x260
   Call Trace:
    ? reuseport_attach_prog+0x6c/0x140
    reuseport_attach_prog+0xdd/0x140
    sk_reuseport_attach_filter+0x97/0xf0
    sk_setsockopt+0x973/0x1cc0
    __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xac/0xc0

   followed by "Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception".

With the proposed fix applied, the same reproducer completes cleanly: no
UBSAN report, no oops, the SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_CBPF call and socket
teardown all succeed, PoC exits 0.

I can share the reproducer program if that is useful.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-06 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-06 13:58 Lin Jiapeng
2026-11-06 14:01 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-11-06 14:55   ` Lin Jiapeng [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4c5e04a6-afba-4f7e-b790-c109ddad0318@gmail.com \
    --to=ljp1205831794@gmail.com \
    --cc=corvus@tencent.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiapenglin@tencent.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®