mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/tdx: Enable #VE reduction feature
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 19:28:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c92909e-cb0f-4917-834c-3425284db808@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241202072431.447380-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>



On 2.12.24 г. 9:24 ч., Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Originally, #VE was defined as the TDX behavior in order to support
> paravirtualization of x86 features that can’t be virtualized by the TDX
> module. The intention is that if guest software wishes to use such a
> feature, it implements some logic to support this. This logic resides in
> the #VE exception handler it may work in cooperation with the host VMM.
> 
> Theoretically, the guest TD’s #VE handler was supposed to act as a "TDX
> enlightenment agent" inside the TD. However, in practice, the #VE
> handler is simplistic:
> 
>    - #VE on CPUID is handled by returning all-0 to the code which
>      executed CPUID. In many cases, an all-0 value is not the correct
>      value, and may cause improper operation.
> 
>    - #VE on RDMSR is handled by requesting the MSR value from the host
>      VMM. This is prone to security issues since the host VMM is
>      untrusted. It may also be functionally incorrect in case the
>      expected operation is to paravirtualize some CPU functionality.
> 
> Newer TDX module provides REDUCE_VE feature. When enabled, it
> drastically cuts cases when guests receives #VE on MSR and CPUID
> accesses. Behaviour of a specific MSR or CPUID leaf/sub-leaf is defined
> in the TDX spec.
> 
> Enable REDUCE_VE. It brings TDX guest behaviour less odd, bring it
> closer to an architectural.
> 
> Note that enabling of the feature doesn't eliminate need in #VE handler
> for CPUID and MSR accesses. Some MSRs still generate #VE (notably
> APIC-related) and kernel needs CPUID #VE handler to ask VMM for leafs in
> hypervisor range.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>


<snip>

      reply	other threads:[~2024-12-03 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-02  7:24 Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-12-03 17:28 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4c92909e-cb0f-4917-834c-3425284db808@suse.com \
    --to=nik.borisov@suse.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®