From: lyude@redhat.com
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@nvidia.com>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Mel Henning <mhenning@darkrefraction.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] drm/nouveau/gsp/r570: Set GcOff = 1 in fbsr
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 13:54:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c953dda5ca7ab96fc419f99f1e0019768ea05a0.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260727175246.642071-3-lyude@redhat.com>
aaaaand I completely forgot to change this from a 1 to 0 in the patch
title ._.
Reviewers - I will make sure this gets fixed before pushing it upstream
On Mon, 2026-07-27 at 13:47 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> Previously, it looked as if we were able to fix suspend/resume on
> some
> desktops by setting Gcoff based on whether or not we were entering
> runtime
> PM. This was a mistake though - the only time suspend/resume would
> end up
> actually working was if Gcoff = 0.
>
> It seems like it's likely the main reason for this is the FBSR GcOff
> argument actually controls GSP's behavior with regards to which
> buffers it
> decides to save across suspend/resume. When GcOff = 1, RM reserved
> regions
> are saved unless they are marked as LOST_ON_SUSPEND, and RM channel-
> context
> and kernel-client buffers are also saved -including- when they are
> LOST_ON_SUSPEND. This means with GcOff = 1, we end up having GSP save
> and
> restore buffers that actually need to be reinitialized on resume -
> causing
> the failures we're setting.
>
> In the long term, we do want to have GcOff = 1 as there are still a
> handful
> of edge cases around broken runtime PM that I've seen on laptops -
> and I
> have a strong guess that actually properly implementing the required
> bits
> for enabling GcOff will probably address a number of those issues.
> For now
> though, disabling GcOff results in runtime PM being dramatically more
> stable then it was before.
>
> Thanks to John Hubbard from Nvidia for providing some background on
> what
> these options do in the GSP firmware do!
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Fixes: 53dac0623853 ("drm/nouveau/gsp: add support for 570.144")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.16+
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r570/fbsr.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r570/fbsr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r570/fbsr.c
> index 2945d5b4e5707..af5aa5065c3dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r570/fbsr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r570/fbsr.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ r570_fbsr_init(struct nvkm_gsp *gsp, struct
> sg_table *sgt, u64 size)
> ctrl->hClient = gsp->internal.client.object.handle;
> ctrl->hSysMem = memlist.handle;
> ctrl->sysmemAddrOfSuspendResumeData = gsp->sr.meta.addr;
> - ctrl->bEnteringGcoffState = 1;
> + ctrl->bEnteringGcoffState = 0;
>
> ret = nvkm_gsp_rm_ctrl_wr(&gsp->internal.device.subdevice,
> ctrl);
> if (ret)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-27 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-27 17:47 [PATCH v4 0/3] drm/nouveau: GSP runtime PM fixes Lyude Paul
2026-07-27 17:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] Revert "nouveau/gsp: fix suspend/resume regression on r570 firmware" Lyude Paul
2026-07-27 17:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] drm/nouveau/gsp/r570: Set GcOff = 1 in fbsr Lyude Paul
2026-07-27 17:54 ` lyude [this message]
2026-07-27 17:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/nouveau/gsp/r570: Enable S/R Display workaround in GSP Lyude Paul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4c953dda5ca7ab96fc419f99f1e0019768ea05a0.camel@redhat.com \
--to=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bskeggs@nvidia.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mhenning@darkrefraction.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ttabi@nvidia.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®