From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
To: Yilei Zheng <trilith.zheng@gmail.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@amd.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Ira Weiny <iweiny@kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm: add shared read-only vmemmap support for FS-DAX
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 17:15:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c9741cf-ac62-41d4-9c7a-7d5ceea4a8e1@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261027065723.66564-1-trilith.zheng@gmail.com>
On 2026/10/27 14:57, Yilei Zheng wrote:
> Hi Muchun,
Hi,
>
> I have been testing this series for microVMs that mount a read-only
> rootfs over virtio-pmem with FS-DAX. In this setup, most file data is
> accessed through read/write rather than mmap, so most PFNs never need
> private writable metadata. This optimization is very useful for
> reducing guest memory overhead and running more VMs on a host.
Thank you very much for the test, so in your scenario, this is also
the behavior of your real workload (mainly read/write-based, rather
than mmap), right?
>
> While testing, I ran into two issues, both in patch 3, including a
> crash when initializing the shared template page during probe, and the
> 128 MiB alignment check preventing our 2 MiB-aligned rootfs images from
> using the optimization, even though the check can be relaxed without
> changing the registration or teardown paths. I have included a patch
> for both at the end of this email.
>
>
> First, regarding the shared template initialization in
> memmap_init_zone_device():
>
>> @@ -1133,6 +1134,15 @@ void __ref memmap_init_zone_device(struct zone *zone,
>> if (!nr_pages)
>> return;
>>
>> + if (pgmap_vmemmap_optimizable(pgmap)) {
>> + struct page *page = page_address(pgmap->vmemmap_shared_page);
>> +
>> + for (int i = 0; i < PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct page); i++)
>> + __init_zone_device_page(page + i, start_pfn + i,
>> + ZONE_DEVICE, nid, pgmap);
>> + goto pageblock_init;
>> + }
> pgmap->vmemmap_shared_page is allocated from normal kernel memory
> (direct map). It is just a template buffer, not a real struct page
> inside the vmemmap space, so passing it to __init_zone_device_page()
> causes page_to_pfn(page) to compute an invalid, out-of-bounds PFN.
Yes, when I first wrote this code, I felt it wasn't very elegant.
But I wanted to share my ideas as early as possible.
>
> I first hit this when backporting the series to a 6.6.117 guest kernel,
> where set_pageblock_migratetype() uses that invalid PFN and crashes
> during device probe.
>
> On your base commit (next-20260902), a normal boot does not crash
> because pageblock init was moved to the end of the function. However,
> set_page_count() still calls page_to_pfn(page) inside the page_ref_set
> tracepoint. Booting with CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGE_REF=y and
> trace_event=page_ref:page_ref_set triggers the same NULL pointer
> dereference during probe:
>
> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008
> #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> Call Trace:
> trace_event_raw_event_page_ref_set+0x4e/0xa0
> __init_zone_device_page+0x98/0xd0
> memmap_init_zone_device+0x1c3/0x2e0
Very detailed analysis. I hadn't considered the potential issues
with set_page_count() before.
>
> To fix this, I added init_fsdax_page_template() to initialize the
> template fields (ZONE_DEVICE links, Reserved flag, pgmap, and refcount/
> mapcount via atomic_set()) directly without calling page_to_pfn(). It
> also preserves the WANT_PAGE_VIRTUAL handling from __init_single_page(),
> since patch 1 enables this optimization on LoongArch where KFENCE
> selects WANT_PAGE_VIRTUAL. I only have x86-64 to test on, so please let
> me know if that part looks right to you.
To be fair, it does fix the issue, but it's not very clean.
I might do some code cleanup first to solve this more gracefully.
I want to move the initialization to where the template page is
allocated, similar to what section-based vmemmap optimization
does.
>
>
> Second, regarding the alignment check in
> pgmap_vmemmap_shared_page_alloc():
>
>> The initial implementation is deliberately limited to a single
>> memory-block-aligned range. That is not a fundamental requirement, but keeps
>> the registration and teardown paths simple; support for multiple ranges or
>> less strict alignment can be added later.
> ...
>> + if (pgmap->nr_range != 1 ||
>> + !IS_ALIGNED(range->start | range_len(range), MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE))
>> + return 0;
> After fixing the crash above, the optimization still did not take
> effect for my 130 MiB test rootfs image. Because MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE
> is 128 MiB on x86-64, the 130 MiB device failed this check and fell
> back to allocating all 520 vmemmap pages.
Right. It is a deliberate decision in v1. It can be improved.
>
> In our microVM setup, rootfs images are sized to fit the filesystem and
> aligned to 2 MiB rather than 128 MiB. In fact, 2 MiB (SUBSECTION_SIZE)
> is already the native alignment for FS-DAX (via memremap_compat_align())
> and for ZONE_DEVICE vmemmap population and teardown. To keep those paths
> simple, we only need to make sure a shared vmemmap page never crosses a
> pgmap boundary, which 2 MiB alignment already guarantees on 4K-page
> kernels.
>
> So I relaxed the check from MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE to SUBSECTION_SIZE.
> I also added an alignment check on (PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct page))
> PFNs, so the same boundary guarantee holds on large page kernels,
> where one vmemmap page covers more than 2 MiB of device memory (such
> as 16K/64K pages on LoongArch).
>
>
> With both changes applied on next-20260902 (QEMU x86-64), probing with
> CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGE_REF=y and trace_event=page_ref:page_ref_set works
> cleanly. The 130 MiB test device now uses one shared vmemmap backing
> page instead of 520 private pages, and DAX faults materialize private
> metadata on demand as expected. Mounting two 2 MiB-aligned virtio-pmem
> devices side by side also works properly, and unbinding/rebinding either
> device does not affect the other.
>
> If these changes look good to you, could you fold them into patch 3 for
> v2? (Note that the patch is against v1 and still uses the
> PGMAP_VMEMMAP_OPTIMIZATION flag.)
Thanks for the analysis and suggestions. However, the reason I
haven't sent out v2 yet is that I've been trying to refactor the
vmemmap optimization logic to make FS_DAX support cleaner. I think
I'll probably do some code refactoring first.
>
> I also noticed that next-20261023 has refactored
> memmap_init_zone_device() to use zone_device_page_init_from_template().
Yeah, this is another case that makes page initialization look less
elegant.
> The mm/mm_init.c change will need to be adapted when rebasing the
> series, while the mm/memremap.c change should remain applicable. I am
> happy to help retest v2.
I'cc you next time if you'd like to help me test.
Thanks,
Muchun
>
> Signed-off-by: Yilei Zheng <trilith.zheng@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/memremap.c | 10 +++++++++-
> mm/mm_init.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memremap.c b/mm/memremap.c
> index a53d09b..34d8d89 100644
> --- a/mm/memremap.c
> +++ b/mm/memremap.c
> @@ -93,8 +93,16 @@ static int pgmap_vmemmap_shared_page_alloc(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap, int nid)
> !(pgmap->flags & PGMAP_VMEMMAP_OPTIMIZATION))
> return 0;
>
> + /*
> + * Subsections can be populated and removed independently, but a
> + * shared vmemmap page must never span across different pgmaps
> + * (which can exceed a subsection on large-page kernels). Check
> + * both boundaries instead of requiring a full memory block.
> + */
> if (pgmap->nr_range != 1 ||
> - !IS_ALIGNED(range->start | range_len(range), MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE))
> + !IS_ALIGNED(range->start | range_len(range), SUBSECTION_SIZE) ||
> + !IS_ALIGNED(PHYS_PFN(range->start | range_len(range)),
> + PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct page)))
> return 0;
>
> pgmap->vmemmap_shared_page = alloc_pages_node(nid, GFP_KERNEL, 0);
> diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
> index 7dd03b8..1c3e269 100644
> --- a/mm/mm_init.c
> +++ b/mm/mm_init.c
> @@ -1030,6 +1030,31 @@ static void __ref __init_zone_device_page(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn,
> }
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Initialize struct page slots in the shared backing page. Because this
> + * page is a direct-map template buffer rather than a real vmemmap entry,
> + * set_page_count() must not be used here as its tracepoint calls
> + * page_to_pfn(). Keep the initialized state in sync with
> + * __init_single_page() and __init_zone_device_page().
> + */
> +static void __ref init_fsdax_page_template(struct page *page,
> + unsigned long pfn, int nid,
> + struct dev_pagemap *pgmap)
> +{
> + mm_zero_struct_page(page);
> + set_page_links(page, ZONE_DEVICE, nid, pfn);
> +#ifdef WANT_PAGE_VIRTUAL
> + if (!is_highmem_idx(ZONE_DEVICE))
> + set_page_address(page, __va(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT));
> +#endif
> + atomic_set(&page->_refcount, 0);
> + atomic_set(&page->_mapcount, -1);
> + page_cpupid_reset_last(page);
> + page_kasan_tag_reset(page);
> + __SetPageReserved(page);
> + page_folio(page)->pgmap = pgmap;
> +}
> +
> static void zone_device_page_init_from_template(struct page *page,
> unsigned long pfn, struct page *template)
> {
> @@ -1138,7 +1163,7 @@ void __ref memmap_init_zone_device(struct zone *zone,
> struct page *page = page_address(pgmap->vmemmap_shared_page);
>
> for (int i = 0; i < PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct page); i++)
> - __init_zone_device_page(page + i, start_pfn + i,
> - ZONE_DEVICE, nid, pgmap);
> + init_fsdax_page_template(page + i, start_pfn + i,
> + nid, pgmap);
> goto pageblock_init;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 12:21 [PATCH 0/4] mm: Reduce struct page overhead for FS-DAX pmem Muchun Song
2026-09-03 12:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: generalize vmemmap remap architecture support Muchun Song
2026-09-21 12:25 ` Oscar Salvador (SUSE)
2026-09-03 12:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] nvdimm/pmem: avoid HWPoison flag updates for clean pages Muchun Song
2026-09-21 7:33 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2026-09-21 12:53 ` Oscar Salvador (SUSE)
2026-09-22 2:33 ` Muchun Song
2026-09-03 12:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: add shared read-only vmemmap support for FS-DAX Muchun Song
2026-09-21 6:42 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2026-09-21 9:33 ` Muchun Song
2026-09-21 11:05 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2026-09-21 13:09 ` Oscar Salvador (SUSE)
2026-09-22 3:17 ` Muchun Song
2026-10-27 6:57 ` Yilei Zheng
2026-10-28 9:15 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2026-09-03 12:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] fsdax: materialize pmem vmemmap metadata on faults Muchun Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4c9741cf-ac62-41d4-9c7a-7d5ceea4a8e1@linux.dev \
--to=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=iweiny@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=pankaj.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=trilith.zheng@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®