From: Yonghong Song <yhs@meta.com>
To: menglong8.dong@gmail.com, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, x86@kernel.org,
imagedong@tencent.com, benbjiang@tencent.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/3] bpf, x86: allow function arguments up to 12 for TRACING
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 14:07:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ca27e23-b027-0e39-495b-2ba3376342cc@meta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230607125911.145345-2-imagedong@tencent.com>
On 6/7/23 5:59 AM, menglong8.dong@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
>
> For now, the BPF program of type BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING can only be used
> on the kernel functions whose arguments count less than 6. This is not
> friendly at all, as too many functions have arguments count more than 6.
Since you already have some statistics, maybe listed in the commit message.
>
> Therefore, let's enhance it by increasing the function arguments count
> allowed in arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(), for now, only x86_64.
>
> For the case that we don't need to call origin function, which means
> without BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG, we need only copy the function arguments
> that stored in the frame of the caller to current frame. The arguments
> of arg6-argN are stored in "$rbp + 0x18", we need copy them to
> "$rbp - regs_off + (6 * 8)".
Maybe I missed something, could you explain why it is '$rbp + 0x18'?
In the current upstream code, we have
/* Generated trampoline stack layout:
*
* RBP + 8 [ return address ]
* RBP + 0 [ RBP ]
*
* RBP - 8 [ return value ] BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG or
*
BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET flags
*
* [ reg_argN ] always
* [ ... ]
* RBP - regs_off [ reg_arg1 ] program's ctx pointer
*
* RBP - nregs_off [ regs count ] always
*
* RBP - ip_off [ traced function ] BPF_TRAMP_F_IP_ARG flag
*
* RBP - run_ctx_off [ bpf_tramp_run_ctx ]
*/
Next on-stack argument will be RBP + 16, right?
>
> For the case with BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG, we need prepare the arguments
> in stack before call origin function, which means we need alloc extra
> "8 * (arg_count - 6)" memory in the top of the stack. Note, there should
> not be any data be pushed to the stack before call the origin function.
> Then, we have to store rbx with 'mov' instead of 'push'.
>
> We use EMIT3_off32() or EMIT4() for "lea" and "sub". The range of the
> imm in "lea" and "sub" is [-128, 127] if EMIT4() is used. Therefore,
> we use EMIT3_off32() instead if the imm out of the range.
>
> It works well for the FENTRY and FEXIT, I'm not sure if there are other
> complicated cases.
MODIFY_RETURN is also impacted by this patch.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jiang Biao <benbjiang@tencent.com>
> Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-08 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-07 12:59 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] " menglong8.dong
2023-06-07 12:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/3] " menglong8.dong
2023-06-07 20:09 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-06-08 3:17 ` Menglong Dong
2023-06-08 21:12 ` Yonghong Song
2023-06-09 2:34 ` Menglong Dong
2023-06-08 21:07 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2023-06-09 2:12 ` Menglong Dong
2023-06-09 4:29 ` Yonghong Song
2023-06-07 12:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/3] bpf, x86: clean garbage value in the stack of trampoline menglong8.dong
2023-06-07 20:03 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-06-08 4:38 ` Menglong Dong
2023-06-07 12:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/3] selftests/bpf: add testcase for FENTRY/FEXIT with 6+ arguments menglong8.dong
2023-06-07 20:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-06-08 4:39 ` Menglong Dong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ca27e23-b027-0e39-495b-2ba3376342cc@meta.com \
--to=yhs@meta.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=benbjiang@tencent.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=imagedong@tencent.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®