Re: [PATCH] udf: balloc: prevent integer overflow in udf_bitmap_free_blocks()

[Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>]

On 6/10/24 10:25 AM, Roman Smirnov wrote:

> An overflow may occur if the function is called with the last
> block and an offset greater than zero. It is necessary to add
> a check to avoid this.
> 
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roman Smirnov <r.smirnov@omp.ru>
> ---
>  fs/udf/balloc.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/udf/balloc.c b/fs/udf/balloc.c
> index ab3ffc355949..cd83bbc7d890 100644
> --- a/fs/udf/balloc.c
> +++ b/fs/udf/balloc.c
> @@ -151,6 +151,13 @@ static void udf_bitmap_free_blocks(struct super_block *sb,
>  	block = bloc->logicalBlockNum + offset +
>  		(sizeof(struct spaceBitmapDesc) << 3);

   Hm, I can't say I understand this code well... Is the block variable here
counted in blocks or bytes?

>  

   As I've already said, we hardly need an empty line here -- just
don't add an empty line after your *if*...

> +	if (block < offset + (sizeof(struct spaceBitmapDesc) << 3)) {

   Thinking about this again, this addition may overflow 32 bits as well,
so it's better to compare block with bloc->logicalBlockNum...

[...]

MBR, Sergey