From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
To: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Sang, Oliver" <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
"Tang, Feng" <feng.tang@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: set X86_FEATURE_OSXSAVE feature after enabling OSXSAVE in CR4
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 22:16:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4cb8d8ab43723e66134626eb0b4fc5fca2371305.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230823065747.92257-1-feng.tang@intel.com>
On Wed, 2023-08-23 at 14:57 +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> 0Day found a 34.6% regression in stress-ng's 'af-alg' test case [1],
> and
> bisected it to commit b81fac906a8f ("x86/fpu: Move FPU initialization
> into arch_cpu_finalize_init()"), which optimizes the FPU init order,
> and moves the CR4_OSXSAVE enabling into a later place:
>
> arch_cpu_finalize_init
> identify_boot_cpu
> identify_cpu
> generic_identify
> get_cpu_cap --> setup cpu capability
> ...
> fpu__init_cpu
> fpu__init_cpu_xstate
> cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_OSXSAVE);
>
> And it makes 'X86_FEATURE_OSXSAVE' feature bit missed in cpu
> capability
> setup. Many security module like 'camellia_aesni_avx_x86_64' depends
> on
> this feature, and will fail to be loaded after the commit, causing
> the
> regression.
>
> So set X86_FEATURE_OSXSAVE feature right after OSXSAVE enabling to
> fix it.
Oh, that's unfortunate.
It might help to include a bit more about the problem in the log. The
piece that confused me at first was that X86_FEATURE_OSXSAVE maps to a
CPUID bit that will change once CR4.OSXSAVE is set. So since the CPUID
bits are read before CR4.OSXSAVE is set, it stores the original unset
value of the bit.
>
> [1].
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202307192135.203ac24e-oliver.sang@intel.com/
>
> Fixes: b81fac906a8f ("x86/fpu: Move FPU initialization into
> arch_cpu_finalize_init()")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> index 0bab497c9436..8ebea0d522d2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> @@ -173,6 +173,9 @@ void fpu__init_cpu_xstate(void)
>
> cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_OSXSAVE);
>
> + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_OSXSAVE))
> + setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_OSXSAVE);
> +
I'd also put a comment here to explain why this is done manually. I'll
toss something out in case it's useful:
/*
* CPUID bit for X86_FEATURE_OSXSAVE value will change once
* CR4.OSXSAVE is set, so update it manually.
*/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-23 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-23 6:57 Feng Tang
2023-08-23 22:16 ` Edgecombe, Rick P [this message]
2023-08-24 1:46 ` Feng Tang
2023-08-24 9:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-24 11:58 ` Feng Tang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4cb8d8ab43723e66134626eb0b4fc5fca2371305.camel@intel.com \
--to=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®