mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: "Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH] virtio-net: hold netdev_lock when pausing rx
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:05:57 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d3a1478-b6fc-47a3-8d77-7eca6a973a06@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b7b1f5de-7003-4960-a9d1-883bf2f1aa77@gmail.com>

When pausing rx (e.g. set up xdp, xsk pool, rx resize), we call
napi_disable() on the receive queue's napi. In delayed refill_work, it
also calls napi_disable() on the receive queue's napi. When
napi_disable() is called on an already disabled napi, it will sleep in
napi_disable_locked while still holding the netdev_lock. As a result,
later napi_enable gets stuck too as it cannot acquire the netdev_lock.
This leads to refill_work and the pause-then-resume tx are stuck
altogether.

This scenario can be reproducible by binding a XDP socket to virtio-net
interface without setting up the fill ring. As a result, try_fill_recv
will fail until the fill ring is set up and refill_work is scheduled.

This commit makes the pausing rx path hold the netdev_lock until
resuming, prevent any napi_disable() to be called on a temporarily
disabled napi.

Fixes: 413f0271f396 ("net: protect NAPI enablement with netdev_lock()")
Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com>
---
  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 7e4617216a4b..74bd1065c586 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -2786,9 +2786,13 @@ static void skb_recv_done(struct virtqueue *rvq)
  }

  static void virtnet_napi_do_enable(struct virtqueue *vq,
-                   struct napi_struct *napi)
+                   struct napi_struct *napi,
+                   bool netdev_locked)
  {
-    napi_enable(napi);
+    if (netdev_locked)
+        napi_enable_locked(napi);
+    else
+        napi_enable(napi);

      /* If all buffers were filled by other side before we napi_enabled, we
       * won't get another interrupt, so process any outstanding packets 
now.
@@ -2799,16 +2803,16 @@ static void virtnet_napi_do_enable(struct 
virtqueue *vq,
      local_bh_enable();
  }

-static void virtnet_napi_enable(struct receive_queue *rq)
+static void virtnet_napi_enable(struct receive_queue *rq, bool 
netdev_locked)
  {
      struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
      int qidx = vq2rxq(rq->vq);

-    virtnet_napi_do_enable(rq->vq, &rq->napi);
+    virtnet_napi_do_enable(rq->vq, &rq->napi, netdev_locked);
      netif_queue_set_napi(vi->dev, qidx, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX, &rq->napi);
  }

-static void virtnet_napi_tx_enable(struct send_queue *sq)
+static void virtnet_napi_tx_enable(struct send_queue *sq, bool 
netdev_locked)
  {
      struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
      struct napi_struct *napi = &sq->napi;
@@ -2825,11 +2829,11 @@ static void virtnet_napi_tx_enable(struct 
send_queue *sq)
          return;
      }

-    virtnet_napi_do_enable(sq->vq, napi);
+    virtnet_napi_do_enable(sq->vq, napi, netdev_locked);
      netif_queue_set_napi(vi->dev, qidx, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_TX, napi);
  }

-static void virtnet_napi_tx_disable(struct send_queue *sq)
+static void virtnet_napi_tx_disable(struct send_queue *sq, bool 
netdev_locked)
  {
      struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
      struct napi_struct *napi = &sq->napi;
@@ -2837,18 +2841,24 @@ static void virtnet_napi_tx_disable(struct 
send_queue *sq)

      if (napi->weight) {
          netif_queue_set_napi(vi->dev, qidx, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_TX, NULL);
-        napi_disable(napi);
+        if (netdev_locked)
+            napi_disable_locked(napi);
+        else
+            napi_disable(napi);
      }
  }

-static void virtnet_napi_disable(struct receive_queue *rq)
+static void virtnet_napi_disable(struct receive_queue *rq, bool 
netdev_locked)
  {
      struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
      struct napi_struct *napi = &rq->napi;
      int qidx = vq2rxq(rq->vq);

      netif_queue_set_napi(vi->dev, qidx, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX, NULL);
-    napi_disable(napi);
+    if (netdev_locked)
+        napi_disable_locked(napi);
+    else
+        napi_disable(napi);
  }

  static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -2875,9 +2885,11 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
           *     instance lock)
           *   - check netif_running() and return early to avoid a race
           */
-        napi_disable(&rq->napi);
+        netdev_lock(vi->dev);
+        napi_disable_locked(&rq->napi);
          still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
-        virtnet_napi_do_enable(rq->vq, &rq->napi);
+        virtnet_napi_do_enable(rq->vq, &rq->napi, true);
+        netdev_unlock(vi->dev);

          /* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
           * we will *never* try to fill again.
@@ -3074,8 +3086,8 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, 
int budget)

  static void virtnet_disable_queue_pair(struct virtnet_info *vi, int 
qp_index)
  {
-    virtnet_napi_tx_disable(&vi->sq[qp_index]);
-    virtnet_napi_disable(&vi->rq[qp_index]);
+    virtnet_napi_tx_disable(&vi->sq[qp_index], false);
+    virtnet_napi_disable(&vi->rq[qp_index], false);
      xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&vi->rq[qp_index].xdp_rxq);
  }

@@ -3094,8 +3106,8 @@ static int virtnet_enable_queue_pair(struct 
virtnet_info *vi, int qp_index)
      if (err < 0)
          goto err_xdp_reg_mem_model;

-    virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[qp_index]);
-    virtnet_napi_tx_enable(&vi->sq[qp_index]);
+    virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[qp_index], false);
+    virtnet_napi_tx_enable(&vi->sq[qp_index], false);

      return 0;

@@ -3347,7 +3359,8 @@ static void virtnet_rx_pause(struct virtnet_info 
*vi, struct receive_queue *rq)
      bool running = netif_running(vi->dev);

      if (running) {
-        virtnet_napi_disable(rq);
+        netdev_lock(vi->dev);
+        virtnet_napi_disable(rq, true);
          virtnet_cancel_dim(vi, &rq->dim);
      }
  }
@@ -3359,8 +3372,10 @@ static void virtnet_rx_resume(struct virtnet_info 
*vi, struct receive_queue *rq)
      if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL))
          schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);

-    if (running)
-        virtnet_napi_enable(rq);
+    if (running) {
+        virtnet_napi_enable(rq, true);
+        netdev_unlock(vi->dev);
+    }
  }

  static int virtnet_rx_resize(struct virtnet_info *vi,
@@ -3389,7 +3404,7 @@ static void virtnet_tx_pause(struct virtnet_info 
*vi, struct send_queue *sq)
      qindex = sq - vi->sq;

      if (running)
-        virtnet_napi_tx_disable(sq);
+        virtnet_napi_tx_disable(sq, false);

      txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, qindex);

@@ -3423,7 +3438,7 @@ static void virtnet_tx_resume(struct virtnet_info 
*vi, struct send_queue *sq)
      __netif_tx_unlock_bh(txq);

      if (running)
-        virtnet_napi_tx_enable(sq);
+        virtnet_napi_tx_enable(sq, false);
  }

  static int virtnet_tx_resize(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct 
send_queue *sq,
@@ -5961,9 +5976,10 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device 
*dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,

      /* Make sure NAPI is not using any XDP TX queues for RX. */
      if (netif_running(dev)) {
+        netdev_lock(dev);
          for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
-            virtnet_napi_disable(&vi->rq[i]);
-            virtnet_napi_tx_disable(&vi->sq[i]);
+            virtnet_napi_disable(&vi->rq[i], true);
+            virtnet_napi_tx_disable(&vi->sq[i], true);
          }
      }

@@ -6000,11 +6016,14 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device 
*dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
          if (old_prog)
              bpf_prog_put(old_prog);
          if (netif_running(dev)) {
-            virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[i]);
-            virtnet_napi_tx_enable(&vi->sq[i]);
+            virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[i], true);
+            virtnet_napi_tx_enable(&vi->sq[i], true);
          }
      }

+    if (netif_running(dev))
+        netdev_unlock(dev);
+
      return 0;

  err:
@@ -6016,9 +6035,10 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device 
*dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,

      if (netif_running(dev)) {
          for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
-            virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[i]);
-            virtnet_napi_tx_enable(&vi->sq[i]);
+            virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[i], true);
+            virtnet_napi_tx_enable(&vi->sq[i], true);
          }
+        netdev_unlock(dev);
      }
      if (prog)
          bpf_prog_sub(prog, vi->max_queue_pairs - 1);
-- 
2.43.0



  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-10  7:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-04  9:39 [PATCH] virtio-net: disable delayed refill " Bui Quang Minh
2025-04-07  1:03 ` Xuan Zhuo
2025-04-07  2:27   ` Bui Quang Minh
2025-04-08  7:34     ` Jason Wang
2025-04-08  9:28       ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-08 14:37         ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-09  6:55           ` Bui Quang Minh
2025-04-09  6:44       ` Bui Quang Minh
2025-04-10  7:02         ` Bui Quang Minh
2025-04-10  7:05           ` Bui Quang Minh [this message]
2025-04-10  7:58             ` [PATCH] virtio-net: hold netdev_lock " Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-04-10  8:09               ` Bui Quang Minh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4d3a1478-b6fc-47a3-8d77-7eca6a973a06@gmail.com \
    --to=minhquangbui99@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®