From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
Cc: <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] PCI: endpoint: Fix clearing start entry in configfs
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 16:42:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d45a8c2-c9db-6e2e-b223-69df26687e32@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200225101825.GA4029@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Hi,
On 25/02/20 3:48 pm, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 07:05:07PM +0900, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
>> Hi Lorenzo,
>>
>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:15:53 +0000 <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 09:24:37PM +0900, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
>>>> The value of 'start' entry is no change whenever writing 0 to configfs.
>>>> So the endpoint that stopped once can't restart.
>>>>
>>>> The following command lines are an example restarting endpoint and
>>>> reprogramming configurations after receiving bus-reset.
>>>>
>>>> echo 0 > controllers/66000000.pcie-ep/start
>>>> rm controllers/66000000.pcie-ep/func1
>>>> ln -s functions/pci_epf_test/func1 controllers/66000000.pcie-ep/
>>>> echo 1 > controllers/66000000.pcie-ep/start
>>>>
>>>> However, the first 'echo' can't set 0 to 'start', so the last 'echo' can't
>>>> restart endpoint.
>>>
>>> I think your description is not correct - pci_epc_group->start is
>>> just used to check if an endpoint has been started or not (in
>>> pci_epc_epf_unlink() and that's a WARN_ON) but nonetheless this
>>> looks like a bug and ought to be fixed.
>>
>> When pci_epc_group->start keeps 1 after starting this controller with
>> 'echo 1 > start', we can never unlink the func1 from the controller
>> because of WARN_ON.
>
> To me "I can never unlink" means that it can't be done, which
> is not what's happening. What's happening is that unlinking triggers
> a warning, which is different.
>
>> I think that unlink/re-link play initialization role of configfs
>> through 'unbind' and 'bind' functions. However, we can't re-initialize
>> configfs.
>>
>> If this is the intended behavior, my patch will make no sense.
>
> Your patch makes sense, your commit log does not, see above.
>
>>> I need Kishon's ACK to proceed.
>
> Yes - then I am happy to merge this patch with a rewritten
> commit log.
I think all this patch does is fixes an in-correct WARN_ON. The start
and stop of endpoint should happen irrespective of this patch. Once the
commit log is fixed to indicate that
Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Thanks
Kishon
>
> Thanks,
> Lorenzo
>
>> I think so, too.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Lorenzo
>>>
>>>> Fixes: d74679911610 ("PCI: endpoint: Introduce configfs entry for configuring EP functions")
>>>> Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c | 1 +
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c
>>>> index d1288a0..4fead88 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c
>>>> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ static ssize_t pci_epc_start_store(struct config_item *item, const char *page,
>>>>
>>>> if (!start) {
>>>> pci_epc_stop(epc);
>>>> + epc_group->start = 0;
>>>> return len;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.7.4
>>>>
>>
>> ---
>> Best Regards,
>> Kunihiko Hayashi
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-25 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-20 12:24 Kunihiko Hayashi
2020-02-21 14:15 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-02-25 10:05 ` Kunihiko Hayashi
2020-02-25 10:18 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-02-25 11:12 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I [this message]
2020-02-26 1:20 ` Kunihiko Hayashi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4d45a8c2-c9db-6e2e-b223-69df26687e32@ti.com \
--to=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®