Thanks! On 2011-03-11 22:28:54 +0800, Andreas Herrmann wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 08:47:01PM +0800, Wang Lei wrote: >> >> On 2011-03-11 19:38:39 +0800, Andreas wrote: >> > >> > Can you please try to boot -rc7 with kernel parameter acpi_skip_timer_override >> > and send the same output (dmesg again also with apic=debug and lspci -nnxxxx) >> > >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Andreas >> > >> > PS: My assumption is that the patch in -rc7 leads to usage of IO-APIC >> > pin2 for timer interrupt (potentially I have broken chipset >> > revision determination for some SB600.) > >> Hi Andreas, >> >> I did what you said, appended acpi_skip_timer_override when boot -rc7. >> Now the fans work OK. I don't know why and I don't think this is the >> final solution. If not, I'll wait. > > Ok, the problem is that all SB[6-8]00 chipsets use the same PCI device ID. > To differntiate the versions I need to check the revision ID. > > With my patch I removed some special treatment for SB600. > (See http://support.amd.com/us/Embedded_TechDocs/46155_sb600_rrg_pub_3.03.pdf) > > Revision ID/Class Code- R - 32 bits - [PCI_Reg: 08h] > Field Name Bits Default Description > RevisionID 7:0 11h / This field reflects the ASIC revision. > 12h / 11h : For ASIC revision A11 > 13h 12h : For ASIC revision A12 > 13h : For ASIC revision A13 > For ASIC revisions after A13, by default this field will read 13h > still. However, if SMBUS PCI config 70h bit 8 is set to 1, a > hidden revision ID can be read from this field. > > The old code temporarily cleared bit 8 in PCI config 70h and received > 13h as revision for device 14.0 on your system (the "hidden revision > ID" shown in your lspci output is 0x14 and that is what the new code > is using). For SB700/SB800 PCI config 70h is reserved ("software > should not write to it") and that is why I wanted to avoid accesses to > that register. (See SB700 documentation > http://support.amd.com/us/Embedded_TechDocs/43009_sb7xx_rrg_pub_1.00.pdf) > > So the right thing to do is to correct the check for SB600 to cover > all SB600 revisions w/o depending on the setting of bit 8 in PCI > config 70h. > > Attached patch should achieve this. > Can you please test this patch on top of -rc7? > > > Thanks a lot, > > Andreas > --- > From 8453f3aef2e2b89ba30877998dcbfc06f475e253 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Andreas Herrmann > Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:16:47 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] x86, quirk: Fix SB600 revision check > > Commit 7f74f8f28a2bd9db9404f7d364e2097a0c42cc12 > (x86 quirk: Fix polarity for IRQ0 pin2 override on SB800 systems) > introduced a regression. It removed some SB600 specific code > to determine the revision ID without adapting a corresponding > revision ID check for SB600. > > See this mail thread > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129980296006380&w=2 > > This patch adapts the corresponding check to cover all SB600 > revisions. > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann > --- > arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c | 7 ++++++- > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c > index 9efbdcc..3755ef4 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c > @@ -159,7 +159,12 @@ static void __init ati_bugs_contd(int num, int slot, int func) > if (rev >= 0x40) > acpi_fix_pin2_polarity = 1; > > - if (rev > 0x13) > + /* > + * SB600: revisions 0x11, 0x12, 0x13, 0x14, ... > + * SB700: revisions 0x39, 0x3a, ... > + * SB800: revisions 0x40, 0x41, ... > + */ > + if (rev >= 0x39) > return; > > if (acpi_use_timer_override) -- Regards, Lei