Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] serial: 8250: omap: Move pm_runtime_get_sync

[Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>]

Hi Greg,

On 10/12/24 3:03 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 12:33:56PM -0500, Judith Mendez wrote:
>> Currently in omap_8250_shutdown, the dma->rx_running
>> flag is set to zero in omap_8250_rx_dma_flush. Next
>> pm_runtime_get_sync is called, which is a runtime
>> resume call stack which can re-set the flag. When the
>> call omap_8250_shutdown returns, the flag is expected
>> to be UN-SET, but this is not the case. This is causing
>> issues the next time UART is re-opened and omap_8250_rx_dma
>> is called. Fix by moving pm_runtime_get_sync before the
>> omap_8250_rx_dma_flush.
> 
> You can go to 72 columns :)

ok, will fix, thanks!

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
> 
> Wait, who wrote this, Bin?  If so, there needs to be a "From:" line
> saying so.

I did not realize I could create a patch for someone, apologies, I
will be sending v3 with correct "From:".

> 
> What commit id does this fix?  Do you want it backported to older
> kernels?  Why mix two different subsystems in the same patch series, who
> is supposed to take it?


I suppose it should be backported to older kernels so I will add back
the fixes tag.

Apologies for sending two different subsystems in one series, I thought
describing as "misc" would be good enough to mix the two, but I can
separate the patches and respin. Thanks.

~ Judith


> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h