From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932437AbXCEPWV (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:22:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932453AbXCEPWV (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:22:21 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.173]:4622 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932437AbXCEPWU (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:22:20 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FrjghrA3EBLo+sn5rNFDD39iY5XEY3j24ekajQE25u3tdthp5ObzINVrTi2oh1QUhzMKcsliQfnwVNtR1aBKfXwS7HiqPA0OD316fPhpFJGBEIq2MvQDU1bihFPt6HyC8iaAxHNN1eWFw6zo1RQ/Vj12C/PxxVATOW8OvJdnrQI= Message-ID: <4d8e3fd30703050722g7844a316m78da0522f0cc81b3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 16:22:17 +0100 From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" To: "Gene Heskett" , "Andrew Morton" Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] RSDL completely fair starvation free interactive cpu scheduler Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Nicolas Mailhot" In-Reply-To: <200703050453.08154.gene.heskett@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <54348.192.54.193.51.1173087934.squirrel@rousalka.dyndns.org> <200703050453.08154.gene.heskett@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/5/07, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 05 March 2007, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > >This looks like -mm stuff if you want it in 2.6.22 > > This needs to get to 2.6.21, it really is that big an improvement. On 3/5/07, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 05 March 2007, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > >This looks like -mm stuff if you want it in 2.6.22 > > This needs to get to 2.6.21, it really is that big an improvement. I didn't try the new cpu scheduler but 2.6.21 is in bug fix only mode so I don't see how this stuff can go in. Maybe Andrew can comment about having it in -mm? Ciao, -- Paolo