From: Julien Panis <jpanis@baylibre.com>
To: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vigneshr@ti.com, afd@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable OMAP watchdog support
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 12:08:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4db1d958-7b11-40d9-3f68-3e9390539cbe@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230718-enable-omap-wd-v2-1-921f829bc0a5@baylibre.com>
On 7/18/23 16:58, Julien Panis wrote:
> Increase build and test coverage by enabling support for OMAP watchdog,
> as used on TI OMAP based boards.
>
> The watchdog timer is an upward counter capable of generating a pulse on
> the reset pin and an interrupt to the device system modules following an
> overflow condition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Panis <jpanis@baylibre.com>
Maybe this patch should not be applied actually. I have 2 questions:
[Q1] Using the following cmd sequence leads to a modified 'multi_v7_defconfig' file:
'make multi_v7_defconfig'
'make savedefconfig'
'mv defconfig arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig'
...even without modifying CONFIG_OMAP_WATCHDOG flag.
I guess it's due to modifications in various Kconfig files (dependencies for instance).
And perhaps it's also due to previous modifications of 'multi_v7_defconfig' file that
were not done by using 'make savedefconfig' (?)
How should I handle that for this patch ? This v2 has been created by modifying
'multi_v7_defconfig' file manually. Using 'make savedefconfig' would be cleaner,
but as a result many flags would be re-organized whereas the commit intends to
enable 1 flag only.
[Q2] I would like to add another flag in order to enable CONFIG_RTC_DRV_OMAP.
Is it better grouping CONFIG_OMAP_WATCHDOG and CONFIG_RTC_DRV_OMAP in
a single commit ? What's recommended ?
Julien Panis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-19 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-18 14:58 Julien Panis
2023-07-19 10:08 ` Julien Panis [this message]
2023-07-21 7:38 ` Tony Lindgren
2023-07-21 8:24 ` Julien Panis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4db1d958-7b11-40d9-3f68-3e9390539cbe@baylibre.com \
--to=jpanis@baylibre.com \
--cc=afd@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®