From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>, Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>
Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cifs: check kzalloc return
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 09:33:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4db484684a6e9b096c7fdf57673fd208d1c4005a.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1545150439-26055-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org>
On Tue, 2018-12-18 at 17:27 +0100, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> kzalloc can return NULL so a check is needed. While there is a
> check for ret_buf there is no check for the allocation of
> ret_buf->crfid.fid - this check is thus added. Both call-sites
> of tconInfoAlloc() check for NULL return of tconInfoAlloc()
> so returning NULL on failure of kzalloc() here seems appropriate.
> As the kzalloc() is the only thing here that can fail it is
> moved to the beginning so as not to initialize other resources
> on failure of kzalloc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>
> Fixes: 3d4ef9a15343 ("smb3: fix redundant opens on root")
> ---
>
> Problem located with an experimental coccinelle script
>
> While at it make checkpatch happy by using *ret_buf->crfid.fid
> rather than struct cifs_fid.
>
> Patch was compile tested with: x86_64_defconfig + CIFS=m
> (with some unrelated smatch warnings and some pending cocci fixes)
>
> Patch is against v4.20-rc7 (localversion-next is next-20181218)
[]
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/misc.c b/fs/cifs/misc.c
[]
> @@ -113,6 +113,13 @@ tconInfoAlloc(void)
> struct cifs_tcon *ret_buf;
> ret_buf = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cifs_tcon), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (ret_buf) {
> + ret_buf->crfid.fid = kzalloc(sizeof(*ret_buf->crfid.fid),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ret_buf->crfid.fid) {
> + kfree(ret_buf);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> atomic_inc(&tconInfoAllocCount);
> ret_buf->tidStatus = CifsNew;
> ++ret_buf->tc_count;
> @@ -120,8 +127,6 @@ tconInfoAlloc(void)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ret_buf->tcon_list);
> spin_lock_init(&ret_buf->open_file_lock);
> mutex_init(&ret_buf->crfid.fid_mutex);
> - ret_buf->crfid.fid = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cifs_fid),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> spin_lock_init(&ret_buf->stat_lock);
> atomic_set(&ret_buf->num_local_opens, 0);
> atomic_set(&ret_buf->num_remote_opens, 0);
Perhaps use a more common style by returning early on the
first possible failure too so the block can be unindented.
Maybe as a separate cleanup patch.
---
fs/cifs/misc.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/cifs/misc.c b/fs/cifs/misc.c
index 113980dba4d8..bee203055b30 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/misc.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/misc.c
@@ -111,21 +111,27 @@ struct cifs_tcon *
tconInfoAlloc(void)
{
struct cifs_tcon *ret_buf;
- ret_buf = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cifs_tcon), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (ret_buf) {
- atomic_inc(&tconInfoAllocCount);
- ret_buf->tidStatus = CifsNew;
- ++ret_buf->tc_count;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ret_buf->openFileList);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ret_buf->tcon_list);
- spin_lock_init(&ret_buf->open_file_lock);
- mutex_init(&ret_buf->crfid.fid_mutex);
- ret_buf->crfid.fid = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cifs_fid),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- spin_lock_init(&ret_buf->stat_lock);
- atomic_set(&ret_buf->num_local_opens, 0);
- atomic_set(&ret_buf->num_remote_opens, 0);
+
+ ret_buf = kzalloc(sizeof(*ret_buf), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!ret_buf)
+ return NULL;
+ ret_buf->crfid.fid = kzalloc(sizeof(*ret_buf->crfid.fid), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!ret_buf->crfid.fid) {
+ kfree(ret_buf);
+ return NULL;
}
+
+ atomic_inc(&tconInfoAllocCount);
+ ret_buf->tidStatus = CifsNew;
+ ++ret_buf->tc_count;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ret_buf->openFileList);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ret_buf->tcon_list);
+ spin_lock_init(&ret_buf->open_file_lock);
+ mutex_init(&ret_buf->crfid.fid_mutex);
+ spin_lock_init(&ret_buf->stat_lock);
+ atomic_set(&ret_buf->num_local_opens, 0);
+ atomic_set(&ret_buf->num_remote_opens, 0);
+
return ret_buf;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-18 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-18 16:27 Nicholas Mc Guire
2018-12-18 17:33 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2018-12-19 7:22 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2018-12-19 10:57 ` Joe Perches
2018-12-21 5:53 ` Steve French
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4db484684a6e9b096c7fdf57673fd208d1c4005a.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=hofrat@osadl.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®