From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mm: Refuse W^X violations
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 13:59:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4dd594ad-490a-68ee-9e32-fbd9f135bd54@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220921200726.GA3094503@roeck-us.net>
On 9/21/22 13:07, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> [ 2.042861] CPA refuse W^X violation: 8000000000000063 -> 0000000000000063 range: 0x00000000c00a0000 - 0x00000000c00a0fff PFN a0
> ILLOPC: cbc65efa: 0f 0b
> [ 2.043267] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c:600 __change_page_attr_set_clr+0xdca/0xdd0
...
> [ 2.050307] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> [ 2.050762] PCI: PCI BIOS area is rw and x. Use pci=nobios if you want it NX.
> [ 2.051115] kernel tried to execute NX-protected page - exploit attempt? (uid: 0)
> [ 2.051115] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: c00fd2bf
This _looks_ like it is working as intended. The PCI BIOS code tried to
make a RWX page. The CPA code refused to do it and presumably returned
an error, leaving a RW page, non-executable page. The PCI code didn't
check the set_memory_x() return code and tried to go execute anyway.
That resulted in the oops.
I was able to reproduce this pretty easily. The workaround from dmesg
is pci=nobios. That seems to do the trick for me, although that advise
was sandwiched between a warning and an oops, so not the easiest to find.
I'm a bit torn what to do on this one. Breaking the boot is bad, but so
is leaving RWX memory around.
Thoughts?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-21 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-29 10:18 Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-29 19:08 ` Kees Cook
2022-09-01 18:17 ` [tip: x86/mm] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-21 20:07 ` [PATCH v2] " Guenter Roeck
2022-09-21 20:59 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2022-09-21 22:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-09-22 3:09 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-09-22 7:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-22 15:00 ` Dave Hansen
2022-09-22 16:38 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-09-22 16:29 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-09-22 19:31 ` [PATCH] x86/mm+efi: Avoid creating W+X mappings Dave Hansen
2022-09-22 22:08 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-09-23 6:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-23 9:49 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-09-23 13:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-09-23 14:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-09-23 18:31 ` Kees Cook
2022-09-23 19:53 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-09-23 21:19 ` Kees Cook
2022-09-23 22:15 ` Dave Hansen
2022-09-23 22:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-09-24 0:04 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-02 10:33 ` [PATCH v2] x86/mm: Refuse W^X violations Pavel Machek
2022-10-24 15:27 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4dd594ad-490a-68ee-9e32-fbd9f135bd54@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®