mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Haifeng Xu <haifeng.xu@shopee.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: lizefan.x@bytedance.com, tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Optimize update_tasks_nodemask()
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 11:33:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4de8821b-e0c0-bf63-4d76-b0ce208cce3b@shopee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2ac6f207-e08a-2a7f-01ae-dfaf15eefaf6@redhat.com>



On 2022/11/24 04:23, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 11/23/22 03:21, haifeng.xu wrote:
>> When change the 'cpuset.mems' under some cgroup, system will hung
>> for a long time. From the dmesg, many processes or theads are
>> stuck in fork/exit. The reason is show as follows.
>>
>> thread A:
>> cpuset_write_resmask /* takes cpuset_rwsem */
>>    ...
>>      update_tasks_nodemask
>>        mpol_rebind_mm /* waits mmap_lock */
>>
>> thread B:
>> worker_thread
>>    ...
>>      cpuset_migrate_mm_workfn
>>        do_migrate_pages /* takes mmap_lock */
>>
>> thread C:
>> cgroup_procs_write /* takes cgroup_mutex and cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem */
>>    ...
>>      cpuset_can_attach
>>        percpu_down_write /* waits cpuset_rwsem */
>>
>> Once update the nodemasks of cpuset, thread A wakes up thread B to
>> migrate mm. But when thread A iterates through all tasks, including
>> child threads and group leader, it has to wait the mmap_lock which
>> has been take by thread B. Unfortunately, thread C wants to migrate
>> tasks into cgroup at this moment, it must wait thread A to release
>> cpuset_rwsem. If thread B spends much time to migrate mm, the
>> fork/exit which acquire cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem also need to
>> wait for a long time.
>>
>> There is no need to migrate the mm of child threads which is
>> shared with group leader. Just iterate through the group
>> leader only.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: haifeng.xu <haifeng.xu@shopee.com>
>> ---
>>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>> index 589827ccda8b..43cbd09546d0 100644
>> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>> @@ -1968,6 +1968,9 @@ static void update_tasks_nodemask(struct cpuset
>> *cs)
>>             cpuset_change_task_nodemask(task, &newmems);
>>   +        if (!thread_group_leader(task))
>> +            continue;
>> +
>>           mm = get_task_mm(task);
>>           if (!mm)
>>               continue;
> 
> Could you try the attached test patch to see if it can fix your problem?
> Something along the line of this patch will be more acceptable.
> 
> Thanks,
> Longman
> 

Hi, Longman.
Thanks for your patch, but there are still some problems.

1)
  (group leader, node: 0,1)
         cgroup0
         /     \
        /       \
    cgroup1   cgroup2
   (threads)  (threads)

If set node 0 in cgroup1 and node 1 in cgroup2, both of them will update
the mm. And the nodemask of mm depends on who set the node last.

2)
   (process, node: 0,1)
         cgroup0
         /     \
        /       \
    cgroup1   cgroup2
   (node: 0)  (node: 1)

If migrate thread from cgroup0 to cgroup1 or cgroup2, cpuset_attach
won't update the mm. So the nodemask of thread, including mems_allowed
and mempolicy(updated in cpuset_change_task_nodemask), is different from
the vm_policy in vma(updated in mpol_rebind_mm).


In a word, if threads have different cpusets with different nodemask, it
will cause inconsistent memory behavior.

Thanks,
Haifeng.



  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-24  3:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-23  8:21 haifeng.xu
2022-11-23 17:05 ` Tejun Heo
2022-11-23 18:48   ` Waiman Long
2022-11-23 18:54     ` Tejun Heo
2022-11-23 19:05       ` Waiman Long
2022-11-23 19:07         ` Tejun Heo
2022-11-23 20:23 ` Waiman Long
2022-11-24  3:33   ` Haifeng Xu [this message]
2022-11-24  4:24     ` Waiman Long
2022-11-24  7:49       ` Haifeng Xu
2022-11-24 23:00         ` Waiman Long
2022-11-25  2:14           ` Haifeng Xu
2022-11-28  7:34           ` Haifeng Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4de8821b-e0c0-bf63-4d76-b0ce208cce3b@shopee.com \
    --to=haifeng.xu@shopee.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®