mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org,
	marc.zyngier@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	christoffer.dall@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/27] arm64: provide pseudo NMI with GICv3
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 13:58:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4dedbcd1-1919-4643-b152-641ec3367757@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180829113734.evdvs46in6j6xksx@holly.lan>



On 29/08/18 12:37, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 04:51:10PM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This series is a continuation of the work started by Daniel [1]. The goal
>> is to use GICv3 interrupt priorities to simulate an NMI.
>>
>> The patches depend on the core API for NMIs patches [2].
> 
> As before... is there a git tree? With the NMI core API I think I might
> be able to get some of my old pseudo-NMI demos working.
> 

Here is the git:

git://linux-arm.org/linux-jt.git v4.19-nmi-pmu-public

there are also a few patches to make the PMU interrupt into an NMI.

> 
>> To achieve this, set two priorities, one for standard interrupts and
>> another, higher priority, for NMIs. Whenever we want to disable interrupts,
>> we mask the standard priority instead so NMIs can still be raised. Some
>> corner cases though still require to actually mask all interrupts
>> effectively disabling the NMI.
>>
>> Daniel Thompson ran some benchmarks [3] on the previous version showing a
>> small (<1%) performance drop when using interrupt priorities.
> 
> IMHO it is very important to disclose which micro-architecture (in this
> case I think I was using C-A53 and GIC-500) the performance drop is
> observed with.
> 
> We know from both micro- and macro-benchmarks that the performance delta
> is deeply dependant on core implementation. In fact, my own work in this
> area stalled largely because the main device that justified my spending
> working-hours on pseudo-NMI was too badly impacted to see it enabled by
> default.
> 

Yes, you're right, I haven't had many boards to test on, the one I 
tested on had 8 C-A57. Not sure about the GIC (it implemented GICv3 
architecture, that's all I know). I had similar results to yours.

I did not have the opportunity to re-run the benchmarks on real hardware 
for this spin however.

Thanks,

Julien

> 
> Daniel.
> 
> 
>> Currently, only PPIs and SPIs can be set as NMIs. IPIs being currently
>> hardcoded IRQ numbers, there isn't a generic interface to set SGIs as NMI
>> for now. LPIs being controlled by the ITS cannot be delivered as NMI.
>> When an NMI is active on a CPU, no other NMI can be triggered on the CPU.
>>
>> Requirements to use this:
>> - Have GICv3
>> - SCR_EL3.FIQ is set to 1 when linux runs or have single security state
>> - Select Kernel Feature -> Use ICC system registers for IRQ masking
>>
>>
>> * Patches 1 to 3 aim at applying some alternatives early in the boot
>>    process.
>>
>> * Patches 4 to 7 ensure the logic of daifflags remains valid
>>    after arch_local_irq flags use ICC_PMR_EL1.
>>
>> * Patches 8 and 9 clean up GIC current priority definition to make it
>>    easier to introduce a new priority
>>
>> * Patches 10 to 16 prepare arch code for the use of priorities, saving and
>>    restoring ICC_PMR_EL1 appropriately
>>
>> * Patches 17 to 20 add the support to GICv3 driver to use priority masking
>>    if required by the architecture
>>
>> * Patches 21 to 23 make arm64 code use ICC_PMR_EL1 to enable/disable
>>    interrupts, leaving PSR.I as often as possible
>>
>> * Patches 24 to 27 add the support for NMIs to GICv3 driver
>>
>>
>> Changes since V4[4]:
>> * Rebased to v4.19-rc1
>> * Adapted GIC driver to the core NMI API
>> * Added option to disable priority masking on command line
>> * Added Daniel's Tested-by on patches related replacing PSR.I toggling with
>>    PMR masking
>> * Fix scope matching for alternative features.
>> * Spotted some more places using PSR.I or daif and replaced with generic
>>    interrupt functions
>>
>> Changes since V3[5]:
>> * Big refactoring. As suggested by Marc Z., some of the bigger patches
>>    needed to be split into smaller one.
>> * Try to reduce the amount of #ifdef for the new feature by introducing
>>    an individual cpufeature for priority masking
>> * Do not track which alternatives have been applied (was a bit dodgy
>>    anyway), and use an alternative for VHE cpu_enable callback
>> * Fix a build failure with arm by adding the correct RPR accessors
>> * Added Suggested-by tags for changes from comming or inspired by Daniel's
>>    series. Do let me know if you feel I missed something and am not giving
>>    you due credit.
>>
>> Changes since V2[6]:
>> * Series rebase to v4.17-rc6
>> * Adapt pathces 1 and 2 to the rework of cpufeatures framework
>> * Use the group0 detection scheme in the GICv3 driver to identify
>>    the priority view, and drop the use of a fake interrupt
>> * Add the case for a GIC configured in a single security state
>> * Use local_daif_restore instead of local_irq_enable the first time
>>    we enable interrupts after a bp hardening in the handling of a kernel
>>    entry. Otherwise PRS.I remains set...
>>
>> Changes since V1[7]:
>> * Series rebased to v4.15-rc8.
>> * Check for arm64_early_features in this_cpu_has_cap (spotted by Suzuki).
>> * Fix issue where debug exception were not masked when enabling debug in
>>    mdscr_el1.
>>
>> Changes since RFC[8]:
>> * The series was rebased to v4.15-rc2 which implied some changes mainly
>>    related to the work on exception entries and daif flags by James Morse.
>>    - The first patch in the previous series was dropped because no longer
>>      applicable.
>>    - With the semantics James introduced of "inheriting" daif flags,
>>      handling of PMR on exception entry is simplified as PMR is not altered
>>      by taking an exception and already inherited from previous state.
>>    - James pointed out that taking a PseudoNMI before reading the FAR_EL1
>>      register should not be allowed as per the TRM (D10.2.29):
>>      "FAR_EL1 is made UNKNOWN on an exception return from EL1."
>>      So in this submission PSR.I bit is cleared only after FAR_EL1 is read.
>> * For KVM, only deal with PMR unmasking/restoring in common code, and VHE
>>    specific code makes sure PSR.I bit is set when necessary.
>> * When detecting the GIC priority view (patch 5), wait for an actual
>>    interrupt instead of trying only once.
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg525077.html
>> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/8/28/661
>> [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/20/803
>> [4] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/24/321
>> [5] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/21/276
>> [6] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/17/335
>> [7] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg620763.html
>> [8] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg610736.html
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Julien
>>
>> -->
>>
>> Daniel Thompson (1):
>>    arm64: alternative: Apply alternatives early in boot process
>>
>> Julien Thierry (26):
>>    arm64: cpufeature: Set SYSREG_GIC_CPUIF as a boot system feature
>>    arm64: cpufeature: Use alternatives for VHE cpu_enable
>>    arm64: daifflags: Use irqflags functions for daifflags
>>    arm64: Use daifflag_restore after bp_hardening
>>    arm64: Delay daif masking for user return
>>    arm64: xen: Use existing helper to check interrupt status
>>    irqchip/gic: Unify GIC priority definitions
>>    irqchip/gic: Lower priority of GIC interrupts
>>    arm64: cpufeature: Add cpufeature for IRQ priority masking
>>    arm64: Make PMR part of task context
>>    arm64: Unmask PMR before going idle
>>    arm/arm64: gic-v3: Add helper functions to manage IRQ priorities
>>    arm64: kvm: Unmask PMR before entering guest
>>    arm64: irqflags: Use ICC_PMR_EL1 for interrupt masking
>>    arm64: daifflags: Include PMR in daifflags restore operations
>>    irqchip/gic-v3: Factor group0 detection into functions
>>    irqchip/gic-v3: Do not overwrite PMR value
>>    irqchip/gic-v3: Remove acknowledge loop
>>    irqchip/gic-v3: Switch to PMR masking after IRQ acknowledge
>>    arm64: Switch to PMR masking when starting CPUs
>>    arm64: Add build option for IRQ masking via priority
>>    arm64: Handle serror in NMI context
>>    irqchip/gic-v3: Detect current view of GIC priorities
>>    irqchip/gic-v3: Add base support for pseudo-NMI
>>    irqchip/gic: Add functions to access irq priorities
>>    irqchip/gic-v3: Allow interrupts to be set as pseudo-NMI
>>
>>   Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt |   3 +
>>   Documentation/arm64/booting.txt                 |   5 +
>>   arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h               |  33 +++
>>   arch/arm64/Kconfig                              |  15 ++
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative.h            |   3 +-
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h             |  33 +++
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h              |  17 +-
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h                |   3 +-
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h             |   2 +
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h              |  29 ++-
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h                    |   3 +-
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h               | 100 +++++++--
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h               |  12 +
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h              |   1 +
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h                 |  13 +-
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/events.h             |   2 +-
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c                 |  28 ++-
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c                 |   1 +
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c                  |  51 ++++-
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S                       |  63 +++++-
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/head.S                        |  35 +++
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/process.c                     |   2 +
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c                         |  12 +
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c                       |   8 +-
>>   arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c                     |  17 ++
>>   arch/arm64/mm/fault.c                           |   5 +-
>>   arch/arm64/mm/proc.S                            |  18 ++
>>   drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.c                |  10 +
>>   drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.h                |   2 +
>>   drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c                |   2 +-
>>   drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c                    | 279 +++++++++++++++++++-----
>>   include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h          |   6 +
>>   include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h                 |   5 -
>>   33 files changed, 699 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 1.9.1

-- 
Julien Thierry

      reply	other threads:[~2018-08-29 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-28 15:51 Julien Thierry
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 01/27] arm64: cpufeature: Set SYSREG_GIC_CPUIF as a boot system feature Julien Thierry
2018-09-21 15:56   ` Marc Zyngier
     [not found]     ` <MWHPR0601MB3707D7CF3B55BF40EEEA0D52C4160@MWHPR0601MB3707.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
2018-09-25  8:13       ` Marc Zyngier
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 02/27] arm64: cpufeature: Use alternatives for VHE cpu_enable Julien Thierry
2018-09-12 10:28   ` James Morse
2018-09-12 12:03     ` Julien Thierry
2018-09-18 17:46       ` James Morse
2018-09-12 12:37     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 03/27] arm64: alternative: Apply alternatives early in boot process Julien Thierry
2018-09-12 10:29   ` James Morse
2018-09-12 16:49     ` Julien Thierry
2018-09-17 23:44       ` Daniel Thompson
2018-09-18  7:37         ` Julien Thierry
2018-09-18 17:47         ` James Morse
2018-09-21 16:05       ` Marc Zyngier
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 04/27] arm64: daifflags: Use irqflags functions for daifflags Julien Thierry
2018-09-12 12:28   ` James Morse
2018-10-03 15:09   ` Catalin Marinas
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 05/27] arm64: Use daifflag_restore after bp_hardening Julien Thierry
2018-09-12 10:32   ` James Morse
2018-09-12 11:11     ` Julien Thierry
2018-09-12 12:28       ` James Morse
2018-09-12 13:03         ` Julien Thierry
2018-10-03 15:12   ` Catalin Marinas
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 06/27] arm64: Delay daif masking for user return Julien Thierry
2018-09-12 10:31   ` James Morse
2018-09-12 13:07     ` Julien Thierry
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 07/27] arm64: xen: Use existing helper to check interrupt status Julien Thierry
2018-08-29 21:35   ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-10-03 15:14   ` Catalin Marinas
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 08/27] irqchip/gic: Unify GIC priority definitions Julien Thierry
2018-10-03  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 09/27] irqchip/gic: Lower priority of GIC interrupts Julien Thierry
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 10/27] arm64: cpufeature: Add cpufeature for IRQ priority masking Julien Thierry
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 11/27] arm64: Make PMR part of task context Julien Thierry
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 12/27] arm64: Unmask PMR before going idle Julien Thierry
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 13/27] arm/arm64: gic-v3: Add helper functions to manage IRQ priorities Julien Thierry
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 14/27] arm64: kvm: Unmask PMR before entering guest Julien Thierry
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 15/27] arm64: irqflags: Use ICC_PMR_EL1 for interrupt masking Julien Thierry
2018-09-21 17:39   ` Julien Thierry
2018-09-21 17:55     ` Julien Thierry
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 16/27] arm64: daifflags: Include PMR in daifflags restore operations Julien Thierry
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 17/27] irqchip/gic-v3: Factor group0 detection into functions Julien Thierry
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 18/27] irqchip/gic-v3: Do not overwrite PMR value Julien Thierry
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 19/27] irqchip/gic-v3: Remove acknowledge loop Julien Thierry
2018-10-03  9:26   ` Marc Zyngier
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 20/27] irqchip/gic-v3: Switch to PMR masking after IRQ acknowledge Julien Thierry
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 21/27] arm64: Switch to PMR masking when starting CPUs Julien Thierry
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 22/27] arm64: Add build option for IRQ masking via priority Julien Thierry
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 23/27] arm64: Handle serror in NMI context Julien Thierry
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 24/27] irqchip/gic-v3: Detect current view of GIC priorities Julien Thierry
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 25/27] irqchip/gic-v3: Add base support for pseudo-NMI Julien Thierry
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 26/27] irqchip/gic: Add functions to access irq priorities Julien Thierry
2018-08-28 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 27/27] irqchip/gic-v3: Allow interrupts to be set as pseudo-NMI Julien Thierry
2018-08-29 11:37 ` [PATCH v5 00/27] arm64: provide pseudo NMI with GICv3 Daniel Thompson
2018-08-29 12:58   ` Julien Thierry [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4dedbcd1-1919-4643-b152-641ec3367757@arm.com \
    --to=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome