mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
To: Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta@linux.dev>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net
Cc: eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org,
	emil@etsalapatis.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Fix linked_externs with bpf-gcc
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 17:01:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e178583-b510-457f-94bc-e0e201698371@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928231441.4037097-1-vineet.gupta@linux.dev>

On 2026-09-28 4:14 p.m., Vineet Gupta wrote:
> test_progs-bpf_gcc fails to build:
> 
>    prog_tests/linked_externs.c:17:23: error: 'struct linked_arena' has no
>        member named 'arena'
> 
> Several problems, all from bpf-gcc not supporting address_space(1).
> 
> First, the arena variables are declared with __arena, but that macro is
> for pointers -- it marks the pointee address space. The one that carries
> placement is __arena_global:
> 
>    #if defined(__BPF_FEATURE_ADDR_SPACE_CAST) && !defined(BPF_ARENA_FORCE_ASM)
>    #define __arena        __attribute__((address_space(1))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("arena")))
>    #define __arena_global __attribute__((address_space(1)))
>    #else
>    #define __arena        __attribute__((btf_type_tag("arena")))
>    #define __arena_global SEC(".addr_space.1")
>    #endif
> 
> __BPF_FEATURE_ADDR_SPACE_CAST is a clang predefine. Under clang the two
> are interchangeable here, since address_space(1) both places the
> variable and is what btf_type_tag would have described. Under bpf-gcc
> __arena is only a BTF type tag, so the definitions land in .data, the
> arena map gets no initial value, and is_skel_data() in bpftool does not
> emit the typed arena member -- hence the build error. Note this is
> distinct from skel->maps.arena, which comes from SEC(".maps") and is
> always present.
> 
> The extern declarations need __arena_global too. Without a section, gcc
> does not place an extern in any DATASEC, so it stays a free-floating
> extern VAR rather than an entry of .addr_space.1. test_relink() only
> walks that DATASEC:
> 
>      id = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, sec_name, BTF_KIND_DATASEC);
>      ...
>          ASSERT_NEQ(btf_var(t)->linkage, BTF_VAR_GLOBAL_EXTERN, "var_resolved");
> 
> so relink_arena would report OK under bpf-gcc whether or not the linker
> resolved anything -- it would not be testing the allocated-section path
> this test exists for.
> 
> Second, placement alone is not enough to run the test. Dereferencing an
> arena global needs an addr_space_cast, which only clang emits:
> 
>    clang:                                  bpf-gcc:
>      r1 = 0x0 ll                             r1 = 0x0 ll
>      r1 = addr_space_cast(r1, 0x0, 0x1)      r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0x0)
>      r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0x0)
> 
> so the verifier sees a scalar and rejects the program:
> 
>    4: (79) r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)
>    R1 invalid mem access 'scalar'
> 
> Guard the program bodies and skip the skeleton subtest, as
> arena_atomics.c already does. The variables stay unconditional so the
> arena is still populated and the skeleton still has its member. The
> fallback bodies reference the externs without dereferencing them:
> 'used' is ignored on an extern, so an unreferenced one is dropped and
> .addr_space.1 loses it again.
> 
> With this, bpf-gcc reports:
> 
>    #217/1   linked_externs/skel_arena:SKIP
>    #217/2   linked_externs/relink_arena:OK
>    #217/3   linked_externs/relink_maps:OK
> 
> with b_val present in .addr_space.1 as linkage=extern, same as clang, so
> relink_arena covers the same path in both. clang still passes all three.
> 
> Fixes: 34354db1b148 ("selftests/bpf: Add linked_externs test for externs in allocated sections")
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta@linux.dev>

Tested-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>

This fixes the current GCC BPF selftests build failure on CI:
https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/actions/runs/36498905340/job/109187331070

nit: The commit message is kinda too long. If you'd like it to be read
by a human, try making it shorter :)

Thanks!

> [...]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-29  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-28 23:14 Vineet Gupta
2026-09-29  0:01 ` Ihor Solodrai [this message]
2026-09-29  0:26   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-09-29  0:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4e178583-b510-457f-94bc-e0e201698371@linux.dev \
    --to=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=vineet.gupta@linux.dev \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®