mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia@transsion.com>,
	jong wu <jianyong.wu@outlook.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Zhongqiu Han <zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"zhongyuan@hygon.cn" <zhongyuan@hygon.cn>,
	"huangsj@hygon.cn" <huangsj@hygon.cn>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Only apply cpufreq pressure where frequency is invariant
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 14:07:18 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e39e935-2339-442b-8b14-a688b605c35e@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d709498b-9572-44bd-a93e-bbed23fd7372@amd.com>

On 9/7/2026 1:37 PM, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> So, I've been trying to understand these bits and looking at
> cpufreq_policy_init_qos(), the "policy->cpuinfo.max_freq" should be the
> frequency including the boost range but I see cpufreq_update_pressure()
> and it says:
> 
>     max_freq = arch_scale_freq_ref(cpu);
>     if (!max_freq)
>         max_freq = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> 
>     capped_freq = policy->max;
> 
>     /*
>      * Handle properly the boost frequencies, which should simply clean
>      * the cpufreq pressure value.
>      */
>     if (max_freq <= capped_freq) {
>         ...
>     }
> 
> 
> Looking at this, I feel "policy->cpuinfo.max_freq" should not include
> the boost frequency, or x86 should implement a arch_scale_freq_ref()
> to know when boost is enabled vs disabled.
> 
> If cpufreq_update_pressure() indeed has to disregard boost frequency,
> and anything above P0 is not considered as pressure, we can simply
> do:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index b898b6544069..068e6d6e15a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -2586,8 +2586,11 @@ static void cpufreq_update_pressure(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  
>  	cpu = cpumask_first(policy->related_cpus);
>  	max_freq = arch_scale_freq_ref(cpu);
> -	if (!max_freq)
> -		max_freq = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> +	if (!max_freq) {
> +		max_freq = __resolve_freq(policy, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq,
> +					  policy->max, policy->min,

My bad, that should have been other way around and use the cpuinfo
fields to prevent capping based on policy limits. Updated diff:

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index b898b6544069..97f4a3ba5107 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2586,8 +2586,11 @@ static void cpufreq_update_pressure(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 
 	cpu = cpumask_first(policy->related_cpus);
 	max_freq = arch_scale_freq_ref(cpu);
-	if (!max_freq)
-		max_freq = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
+	if (!max_freq) {
+		max_freq = __resolve_freq(policy, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq,
+					  policy->cpuinfo.min_freq, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq,
+					  CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
+	}
 
 	capped_freq = policy->max;
 
---

> +					  CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
> +	}
>  
>  	capped_freq = policy->max;
>  
> ---
> 
> __resolve_freq() will cap "policy->cpuinfo.max_freq" based on the freq_table
> entries if it exists (acpi-cpufreq), or otherwise return
> "policy->cpuinfo.max_freq" as is for drivers that uses CPPC based scaling
> (amd-pstate, intel_pstate).
> 
> Thoughts? 
> 

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-07  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-21  7:39 Jianyong Wu
2026-08-21  9:26 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-08-24  3:44 ` Hongyan Xia
2026-08-24 13:06   ` Jianyong Wu
2026-08-25  7:40     ` Hongyan Xia
2026-09-02  9:00       ` jong wu
2026-08-25 13:05     ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-02  8:49       ` jong wu
2026-09-02  9:37         ` Hongyan Xia
2026-09-03  2:04           ` jong wu
2026-09-07  2:32             ` Hongyan Xia
2026-09-07  8:07               ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-07  8:37                 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-09-08  7:19                   ` jong wu
2026-09-09  4:09                   ` Hongyan Xia
2026-09-09 10:04                     ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-10  8:05                       ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-10 11:59                         ` Jianyong Wu
2026-09-12  7:11                       ` Jianyong Wu
2026-09-07 14:57               ` jong wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4e39e935-2339-442b-8b14-a688b605c35e@amd.com \
    --to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=hongyan.xia@transsion.com \
    --cc=huangsj@hygon.cn \
    --cc=jianyong.wu@outlook.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=zhongyuan@hygon.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®