From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6951EC432C1 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:37:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6A7207FD for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:37:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2503654AbfIXAhV (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:37:21 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56916 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2503641AbfIXAhV (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:37:21 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1000756 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id m6so18411wmf.2 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:37:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:openpgp:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LHmEi+os+D0XekQst/axaZyK+/1jvY+ikX3lz8Z3eVo=; b=LAxvuTW7WuoF5thYjsT1ibquA+s2+xv0BLcEbxNZKn5ga/uCt0mwE+s+lChD0PPFp9 okaE8nq3B1zbWwsoKWSyzz2pjhIEme8U9YKfOstVyKcuEJbBb56FLzCXoWvSLDyPP10/ kQxEhaYdUpzplD/a+Jv1HKIhjmcWaFluTA+OcNmOH5eQvbVLjAtfltDBHwpeCpe8VQeM eqQmSs0+XboMIkjBQr2ZlHSSisM3hRp58jiScqw9d8BZYiwDKaDiF5bJlLxxvKoAdcvl uetnAYhSg6Lwk1mAIOtlYJ1d7ojw0EqEcF5V8PQnY1dGqVFmUtIldlVAS5bdKZ8w9mzp /KVw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWYZojmGCV6iyj9NUjFdgNJfcIj9kpWRhihkupIgAzhqX1pY13N qg0794F3zqy00d/jCOQCpHy1BPSpYquDPQ9OdMoxk72vmADmJ48txEKx0M4xvqCIDKiuhXy1Bjr OzSGJ5ra3euidmzmhddpnNJ8K X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c10b:: with SMTP id w11mr199635wmi.108.1569285439339; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:37:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxpYSYti8BI01M0rZ0ppMB3xZdaOJULpHyf5Iueq0t73HDKfp0Fu4g9AC5vJdsyguZ+XhKPNg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c10b:: with SMTP id w11mr199623wmi.108.1569285439098; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:37:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:9520:22e6:6416:5c36? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:9520:22e6:6416:5c36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e6sm64650wrp.91.2019.09.23.17.37.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:37:18 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/17] KVM: retpolines: x86: eliminate retpoline from vmx.c exit handlers To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Vitaly Kuznetsov , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Marcelo Tosatti , Peter Xu , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20190920212509.2578-1-aarcange@redhat.com> <20190920212509.2578-16-aarcange@redhat.com> <87o8zb8ik1.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> <7329012d-0b3b-ce86-f58d-3d2d5dc5a790@redhat.com> <20190923190514.GB19996@redhat.com> <20190923202349.GL18195@linux.intel.com> <20190923210838.GA23063@redhat.com> <20190924003459.GA13147@linux.intel.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <4e5e3459-98a3-8263-f328-f2e636d5e046@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 02:37:17 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190924003459.GA13147@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 24/09/19 02:35, Sean Christopherson wrote: >> I agree. I think the way Andrea did it in his patch may not the nicest >> but is (a bit surprisingly) the easiest and most maintainable. > Heh, which patch? The original patch of special casing the high > priority exits? Yes. Paolo