mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konstantin Neumoin <kneumoin@virtuozzo.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] update balloon size in balloon "probe"
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 17:03:50 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f17023e-7e29-2c55-f7b7-0eff2dd014b3@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c41cf1cf-35e5-1f31-0d2c-9864e6012ac9@virtuozzo.com>

On 09/26/2016 10:16 AM, Konstantin Neumoin wrote:
> On 09/23/2016 09:58 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 04:47:57PM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>>> From: Konstantin Neumoin <kneumoin@virtuozzo.com>
>>>
>>> Patch
>>>      Commit 3d2a3774c1b046f548ebea0391a602fd5685a307
>>>      Author: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>>>      Date:   Tue Mar 10 11:55:08 2015 +1030
>>>      virtio-balloon: do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING
>>> has added a regression. Original code with wait_event_interruptible
>>> checked the condition before start waiting and started balloon 
>>> operations
>>> if necessary.
>> I don't get it, sorry.
>>
>> +               add_wait_queue(&vb->config_change, &wait);
>> +               for (;;) {
>> +                       if ((diff = towards_target(vb)) != 0 ||
>> +                           vb->need_stats_update ||
>> +                           kthread_should_stop() ||
>> +                           freezing(current))
>> +                               break;
>> +                       wait_woken(&wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, 
>> MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
>> +               }
>> +               remove_wait_queue(&vb->config_change, &wait);
>>
>> Seems to check the condition before waiting.
>>
>> The issue is more likely with this patch:
>>
>>     commit fad7b7b27b6a168ca8ebc84482043886f837b89d
>>     Author: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
>>     Date:   Mon Jan 25 17:38:05 2016 +0100
>>
>>         virtio_balloon: Use a workqueue instead of "vballoon" kthread
> yes, you are right, sorry, commit message is incorrect.
>>
>>
>>> Right now balloon is not inflated if ballon target is set before the
>>> driver is loaded.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Neumoin <kneumoin@virtuozzo.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
>>> CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 4 ++++
>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c 
>>> b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
>>> index 4e7003d..0a6c10f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
>>> @@ -577,6 +577,10 @@ static int virtballoon_probe(struct 
>>> virtio_device *vdev)
>>>         virtio_device_ready(vdev);
>>>   +    if (towards_target(vb))
>>> +        virtballoon_changed(vdev);
>>> +    update_balloon_size(vb);
>>> +
>>>       return 0;
>>>     out_del_vqs:
>>
>> I know we have same thing on restore, but it seems bogus
>> there as well:
>>          if (towards_target(vb))
>>                  virtballoon_changed(vdev);
>>          update_balloon_size(vb);
>>
>> makes no sense because virtballoon_changed merely queues
>> the work.
>  in virtballoon_probe we just init work items, but if we have a target 
> - num_pages != 0
> we will catch it only after virtballoon_changed will be called, isn't it?
>
>  So, I believe, on probe, we have to do the same thing as on restore: 
> check towards_target(vb)
> and call virtballoon_changed(vdev) if necessary.
>>

  Also we could try inflate the balloon once(by fill_balloon()) on probe 
and it leads to config change,
but we will not receive this notification because of config change 
pending will be enabled after
drv->prob() in virtio_dev_probe.
>>> -- 
>>> 2.7.4
>
>

      reply	other threads:[~2016-09-28 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-23 13:47 Denis V. Lunev
2016-09-23 18:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-09-26  7:16   ` Konstantin Neumoin
2016-09-28 14:03     ` Konstantin Neumoin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4f17023e-7e29-2c55-f7b7-0eff2dd014b3@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=kneumoin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®