Re: [PATCH RESEND] samples/kobject: Use sysfs_emit instead of snprintf

[Phi Nguyen <phind.uet@gmail.com>]

On 3/3/2022 4:22 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 02:11:36AM +0800, Phi Nguyen wrote:
>> On 3/2/2022 10:51 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 08:07:59PM +0800, Nguyen Dinh Phi wrote:
>>>> Convert sprintf() to sysfs_emit() in order to check buffer overrun on sysfs
>>>> outputs.
>>>
>>> There are no such buffer overruns on these sysfs files.
>>>
>> I don't want to duplicate the title so I use the description of sysfs_emit()
>> as the patch message. I have just realized that the title is also incorrect,
>> sorry for my mistake.
>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    samples/kobject/kobject-example.c | 4 ++--
>>>>    samples/kobject/kset-example.c    | 4 ++--
>>>>    2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Why is this a resend?  What happened to the first version?
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>
>> There is no response for the first version. Actually, there is no Maintainer
>> is associated with these two files (in MAINTAINERS files), hence, my first
>> patch was only sent to the linux-kernel mailing list.
> 
> You need to give reviewers a hint as to what is going on when you do
> this, we can't read minds :)
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
Hi Greg,

Am I right in thinking that you are the maintainer of these files? Can I 
send a patch to add an entry to /linux/MAINTAINERS file?

BR,
Phi.