From: cboulte@gmail.com
To: Nadia.Derbey@bull.net
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, manfred@colorfullife.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] (v3) SYSVIPC - Fix the ipc structures initialization
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:32:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f3ee3290810270332p56e1f99q24a5eea818e626ee@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081027072836.438113395@bull.net>
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 8:28 AM, <Nadia.Derbey@bull.net> wrote:
>
> This patch is a fix for Bugzilla bug
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11796.
>
> To summarize, a simple testcase is concurrently running an infinite loop on
> msgctl(IPC_STAT) and a call to msgget():
>
> while (1)
> msgctl(id, IPC_STAT) 1
> |
> |
> |
> 2 id = msgget(key, IPC_CREAT)
> |
> |
> |
>
> In the interval [1-2], the id doesn't exist yet.
>
> In that test, the problem is the following:
> When we are calling ipc_addid() from msgget() the msq structure is not
> completely initialized. So idr_get_new() is inserting a pointer into the
> idr tree, and the structure which is pointed to has, among other fields,
> its lock uninitialized.
>
> Since msgctl(IPC_STAT) is looping while (1), idr_find() returns the
> pointer as soon as it is inserted into the IDR tree. And ipc_lock()
> calls spin_lock(&mqs->lock), while we have not initialized that lock
> yet.
>
> This patch moves the spin_lock_init() before the call to ipc_addid().
> It also sets the "deleted" flag to 1 in the window between msg structure
> allocation and msg structure locking in ipc_addid().
>
>
> Regards,
> Nadia
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@bull.net>
>
> ---
> ipc/util.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.27/ipc/util.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.27.orig/ipc/util.c 2008-10-23 15:20:46.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.27/ipc/util.c 2008-10-24 17:48:33.000000000 +0200
> @@ -266,6 +266,17 @@ int ipc_addid(struct ipc_ids* ids, struc
> if (ids->in_use >= size)
> return -ENOSPC;
>
> + spin_lock_init(&new->lock);
> +
> + /*
> + * We have a window between the time new is inserted into the idr
> + * tree and the time it is actually locked.
> + * In order to be safe during that window set the new ipc structure
> + * as deleted: a concurrent ipc_lock() will see it as not present
> + * until the initialization phase is complete.
> + */
> + new->deleted = 1;
> +
> err = idr_get_new(&ids->ipcs_idr, new, &id);
> if (err)
> return err;
> @@ -280,10 +291,11 @@ int ipc_addid(struct ipc_ids* ids, struc
> ids->seq = 0;
>
> new->id = ipc_buildid(id, new->seq);
> - spin_lock_init(&new->lock);
> - new->deleted = 0;
> rcu_read_lock();
> spin_lock(&new->lock);
> +
> + new->deleted = 0;
> +
> return id;
> }
>
>
> --
>
Still got the lock... I'm using a 4 cpus node: Intel Xeon @ 2.8GHz...
don't know if it has an impact.
The only way I found to have no lock, it's to spin_lock the ipc
_before_ inserting it into the idr.
Best regards, c.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-27 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20081027072826.266777838@bull.net>
2008-10-27 7:28 ` Nadia.Derbey
2008-10-27 10:32 ` cboulte [this message]
2008-10-27 11:04 ` Nadia Derbey
2008-10-27 15:42 ` Nadia Derbey
2008-10-28 9:44 ` cboulte
2008-10-28 11:05 ` Nadia Derbey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f3ee3290810270332p56e1f99q24a5eea818e626ee@mail.gmail.com \
--to=cboulte@gmail.com \
--cc=Nadia.Derbey@bull.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®