From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Cc: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Corentin Labbe" <clabbe@baylibre.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, mturquette@baylibre.com,
p.zabel@pengutronix.de, robh+dt@kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org,
ricardo@pardini.net, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] reset: rockchip: secure reset must be used by SCMI
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 22:28:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f86c7da-5589-4451-89cb-739b97b67170@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231111205115.6hkhjj37ypeq45ax@mercury.elektranox.org>
On 11/11/2023 21:51, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 06:45:03PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 07/11/2023 18:35, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>>> Am Dienstag, 7. November 2023, 17:21:41 CET schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
>>>> On 07/11/2023 16:55, Corentin Labbe wrote:
>>>>> While working on the rk3588 crypto driver, I loose lot of time
>>>>> understanding why resetting the IP failed.
>>>>> This is due to RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET being in the secure world,
>>>>> so impossible to operate on it from the kernel.
>>>>> All resets in this block must be handled via SCMI call.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c | 42 ------------
>>>>> .../dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h | 68 +++++++++----------
>>>>
>>>> Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. Some
>>>> warnings can be ignored, but the code here looks like it needs a fix.
>>>> Feel free to get in touch if the warning is not clear.
>>>>
>>>>> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c
>>>>> index e855bb8d5413..6556d9d3c7ab 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c
>>>>> @@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
>>>>> /* 0xFD7C8000 + 0x0A00 */
>>>>> #define RK3588_PHPTOPCRU_RESET_OFFSET(id, reg, bit) [id] = (0x8000*4 + reg * 16 + bit)
>>>>>
>>>>> -/* 0xFD7D0000 + 0x0A00 */
>>>>> -#define RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(id, reg, bit) [id] = (0x10000*4 + reg * 16 + bit)
>>>>> -
>>>>> /* 0xFD7F0000 + 0x0A00 */
>>>>> #define RK3588_PMU1CRU_RESET_OFFSET(id, reg, bit) [id] = (0x30000*4 + reg * 16 + bit)
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -806,45 +803,6 @@ static const int rk3588_register_offset[] = {
>>>>> RK3588_PMU1CRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_P_PMU0IOC, 5, 4),
>>>>> RK3588_PMU1CRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_P_GPIO0, 5, 5),
>>>>> RK3588_PMU1CRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_GPIO0, 5, 6),
>>>>> -
>>>>> - /* SECURECRU_SOFTRST_CON00 */
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_A_SECURE_NS_BIU, 0, 10),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_SECURE_NS_BIU, 0, 11),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_A_SECURE_S_BIU, 0, 12),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_SECURE_S_BIU, 0, 13),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_P_SECURE_S_BIU, 0, 14),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_CRYPTO_CORE, 0, 15),
>>>>> -
>>>>> - /* SECURECRU_SOFTRST_CON01 */
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_CRYPTO_PKA, 1, 0),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_CRYPTO_RNG, 1, 1),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_A_CRYPTO, 1, 2),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_CRYPTO, 1, 3),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_KEYLADDER_CORE, 1, 9),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_KEYLADDER_RNG, 1, 10),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_A_KEYLADDER, 1, 11),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_KEYLADDER, 1, 12),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_P_OTPC_S, 1, 13),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_OTPC_S, 1, 14),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_WDT_S, 1, 15),
>>>>> -
>>>>> - /* SECURECRU_SOFTRST_CON02 */
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_T_WDT_S, 2, 0),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_BOOTROM, 2, 1),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_A_DCF, 2, 2),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_P_DCF, 2, 3),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_BOOTROM_NS, 2, 5),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_P_KEYLADDER, 2, 14),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_TRNG_S, 2, 15),
>>>>> -
>>>>> - /* SECURECRU_SOFTRST_CON03 */
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_TRNG_NS, 3, 0),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_D_SDMMC_BUFFER, 3, 1),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_SDMMC, 3, 2),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_SDMMC_BUFFER, 3, 3),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_SDMMC, 3, 4),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_P_TRNG_CHK, 3, 5),
>>>>> - RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_TRNG_S, 3, 6),
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> void rk3588_rst_init(struct device_node *np, void __iomem *reg_base)
>>>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h b/include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h
>>>>> index d4264db2a07f..c0d08ae78cd5 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h
>>>>> @@ -716,39 +716,39 @@
>>>>> #define SRST_P_GPIO0 627
>>>>> #define SRST_GPIO0 628
>>>>>
>>>>> -#define SRST_A_SECURE_NS_BIU 629
>>>>> -#define SRST_H_SECURE_NS_BIU 630
>>>>> -#define SRST_A_SECURE_S_BIU 631
>>>>> -#define SRST_H_SECURE_S_BIU 632
>>>>> -#define SRST_P_SECURE_S_BIU 633
>>>>> -#define SRST_CRYPTO_CORE 634
>>>>> -
>>>>> -#define SRST_CRYPTO_PKA 635
>>>>> -#define SRST_CRYPTO_RNG 636
>>>>> -#define SRST_A_CRYPTO 637
>>>>> -#define SRST_H_CRYPTO 638
>>>>> -#define SRST_KEYLADDER_CORE 639
>>>>> -#define SRST_KEYLADDER_RNG 640
>>>>> -#define SRST_A_KEYLADDER 641
>>>>> -#define SRST_H_KEYLADDER 642
>>>>> -#define SRST_P_OTPC_S 643
>>>>> -#define SRST_OTPC_S 644
>>>>> -#define SRST_WDT_S 645
>>>>> -
>>>>> -#define SRST_T_WDT_S 646
>>>>> -#define SRST_H_BOOTROM 647
>>>>> -#define SRST_A_DCF 648
>>>>> -#define SRST_P_DCF 649
>>>>> -#define SRST_H_BOOTROM_NS 650
>>>>> -#define SRST_P_KEYLADDER 651
>>>>> -#define SRST_H_TRNG_S 652
>>>>> -
>>>>> -#define SRST_H_TRNG_NS 653
>>>>> -#define SRST_D_SDMMC_BUFFER 654
>>>>> -#define SRST_H_SDMMC 655
>>>>> -#define SRST_H_SDMMC_BUFFER 656
>>>>> -#define SRST_SDMMC 657
>>>>> -#define SRST_P_TRNG_CHK 658
>>>>> -#define SRST_TRNG_S 659
>>>>> +#define SRST_A_SECURE_NS_BIU 10
>>>>
>>>> NAK. You just broke all users.
>>>
>>> If I'm reading the commit message correctly, all resets in that area
>>> couldn't have any users to begin with, as the registers controlling them
>>> are in the secure space, and need a higher exception level
>>>
>>> So if anything is trying to handle these resets, would end up with some
>>> security exception right now.
>>>
>>> Though I guess we might want to use different names and not reuse the
>>> existing ones. scmi clocks use a SCMI_CLK_* id scheme, so maybe SCMI_SRST_* ?
>>
>> I don't quite get what the patch wants to achieve. Why dropping driver
>> support for given reset ID is connected with changing the value of
>> binding for given reset?
>>
>> What is the point of this define SRST_A_SECURE_NS_BIU 10?
>
> This is about two different reset controllers. The IDs defined here
> are used by the operating system to access the correct registers.
> The kernel has a LUT from the ID to a register addresses, which is
> something you asked for during upstreaming.
>
> The ID defined by Corentin is for reset control via SCMI firmware,
> which has different number scheme than Linux. To me the suggestion
> from Heiko looks sensible (i.e. create a new ID scheme and keep the
> current one unchanged).
So the binding is not for Linux but for FW? This should be explained in
the commit msg.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-11 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-07 15:55 [PATCH 0/6] crypto: rockchip: add support for rk3588/rk3568 Corentin Labbe
2023-11-07 15:55 ` [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: crypto: add support for rockchip,crypto-rk3588 Corentin Labbe
2023-11-07 16:40 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-20 12:37 ` Corentin LABBE
2023-11-21 9:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-07 15:55 ` [PATCH 2/6] MAINTAINERS: add new dt-binding doc to the right entry Corentin Labbe
2023-11-07 16:20 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-20 12:37 ` Corentin LABBE
2023-11-07 15:55 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM64: dts: rk3588: add crypto node Corentin Labbe
2023-11-07 15:59 ` Heiko Stübner
2023-11-20 12:38 ` Corentin LABBE
2023-11-07 16:20 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-20 12:38 ` Corentin LABBE
2023-11-07 15:55 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM64: dts: rk356x: " Corentin Labbe
2023-11-07 16:00 ` Heiko Stübner
2023-11-07 16:21 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-07 15:55 ` [PATCH 5/6] reset: rockchip: secure reset must be used by SCMI Corentin Labbe
2023-11-07 16:21 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-07 17:35 ` Heiko Stübner
2023-11-07 17:45 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-11 20:51 ` Sebastian Reichel
2023-11-11 21:28 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2023-11-12 20:26 ` Sebastian Reichel
2023-11-20 12:42 ` Corentin LABBE
2023-11-07 15:55 ` [PATCH 6/6] crypto: rockchip: add rk3588 driver Corentin Labbe
2023-11-07 16:35 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-07 16:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-07 16:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-12 14:04 ` Aw: " Frank Wunderlich
2023-11-20 12:48 ` Corentin LABBE
2023-11-24 15:05 ` Aw: " Frank Wunderlich
2023-11-27 11:47 ` Corentin LABBE
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f86c7da-5589-4451-89cb-739b97b67170@linaro.org \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=clabbe@baylibre.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=ricardo@pardini.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®