mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Pollinger <tpolling@rhone.ch>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG REPORT] TCP/IP weirdness in 2.2.15
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 11:15:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5.0.0.25.0.20001106111445.034a8660@stargate> (raw)


Hi Stephen

>Let me see if I understand this correct:
>
>         Client  Router  Server
>         ------------------------------------
>         Linux   Linux   HPUX            Bad
>         WinNT   Linux   HPUX            Good
>         HPUX    Linux   HPUX            Good
>
>With all Linux boxes version 2.2.something
>
>Is this correct?

Yes, this is right.

>This is slightly different from my situation; I had a Linux client and
>Linux server directly connected to the same switch (3Com Superstack
>II, FWIW)

This is probably a configuration I'm going to try as well: put the cvs 
server on a linux box and have it communicate to different clients. 
However, the configuration I have now simply suggests that there cannot be 
a problem on the IP level as the Linux box as router is working as expected.


>Perhaps if I get time I'll repeat the experiment with (a) the most
>recent Alan pre-2.2 kernel and (b) the most recent 2.4-test kernel...
>
>I'll re-iterate my original request, which was not "it's broke - can
>you fix it" but was "okay, how do I go about tracking this one down?"

At this stage, I am uncertain of the cause of the problem. I am pretty much 
sure that the card, drivers and the IP level should work as expected. It is 
lilkely that there could be a problem with CVS which gets caught in a kind 
of deadlock - however, observing the TCP-packet communication and the 
system calls done by both CVS client and server shows always the same 
result (I put a printf before and after the read/recv call in the client):
         - The clilent is stuck in the read system call on the socket for 
reads and waits forever
         - The server gets EWOULDBLOCK notifications when writing to the 
socket and eventually goes
           to sleep
         - The last packages sent by the server will be resent roughly 
every 30-60 seconds.
           The client either responds no packages accepted or the last 
packages are accepted by the
           client but the system call still blocks.

Regards,
-Thomas

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

             reply	other threads:[~2000-11-06 19:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-11-06 19:15 Thomas Pollinger [this message]
2000-11-11 17:05 ` kuznet
2000-11-12  0:49 ` Thomas Pollinger
2000-11-12 13:20   ` kuznet
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-11-04  1:32 Thomas Pollinger
2000-11-06  9:38 ` Stephen Landamore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5.0.0.25.0.20001106111445.034a8660@stargate \
    --to=tpolling@rhone.ch \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®