From: Thomas Pollinger <tpolling@rhone.ch>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG REPORT] TCP/IP weirdness in 2.2.15
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 11:15:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5.0.0.25.0.20001106111445.034a8660@stargate> (raw)
Hi Stephen
>Let me see if I understand this correct:
>
> Client Router Server
> ------------------------------------
> Linux Linux HPUX Bad
> WinNT Linux HPUX Good
> HPUX Linux HPUX Good
>
>With all Linux boxes version 2.2.something
>
>Is this correct?
Yes, this is right.
>This is slightly different from my situation; I had a Linux client and
>Linux server directly connected to the same switch (3Com Superstack
>II, FWIW)
This is probably a configuration I'm going to try as well: put the cvs
server on a linux box and have it communicate to different clients.
However, the configuration I have now simply suggests that there cannot be
a problem on the IP level as the Linux box as router is working as expected.
>Perhaps if I get time I'll repeat the experiment with (a) the most
>recent Alan pre-2.2 kernel and (b) the most recent 2.4-test kernel...
>
>I'll re-iterate my original request, which was not "it's broke - can
>you fix it" but was "okay, how do I go about tracking this one down?"
At this stage, I am uncertain of the cause of the problem. I am pretty much
sure that the card, drivers and the IP level should work as expected. It is
lilkely that there could be a problem with CVS which gets caught in a kind
of deadlock - however, observing the TCP-packet communication and the
system calls done by both CVS client and server shows always the same
result (I put a printf before and after the read/recv call in the client):
- The clilent is stuck in the read system call on the socket for
reads and waits forever
- The server gets EWOULDBLOCK notifications when writing to the
socket and eventually goes
to sleep
- The last packages sent by the server will be resent roughly
every 30-60 seconds.
The client either responds no packages accepted or the last
packages are accepted by the
client but the system call still blocks.
Regards,
-Thomas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next reply other threads:[~2000-11-06 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-06 19:15 Thomas Pollinger [this message]
2000-11-11 17:05 ` kuznet
2000-11-12 0:49 ` Thomas Pollinger
2000-11-12 13:20 ` kuznet
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-11-04 1:32 Thomas Pollinger
2000-11-06 9:38 ` Stephen Landamore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5.0.0.25.0.20001106111445.034a8660@stargate \
--to=tpolling@rhone.ch \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®