From: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>
To: "Eric S. Raymond" <esr@snark.thyrsus.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: CML2 1.1.1, wiuth experimental fast mode
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 11:41:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.2.20010415112829.00b11ec0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200104150345.f3F3jxG16241@snark.thyrsus.com>
At 04:45 15/04/2001, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>Release 1.1.1: Sat Apr 14 23:41:34 EDT 2001
> * The old menuconfig shortcut that 'm' in a boolean entry field
> sets 'y' is now implemented.
> * Simplified color scheme.
Much better now! make xconfig still seems to be the old way (hadn't tried
it before)? - At least I get two shades of green. The lighter one is
completely unreadable on the silver background. Could I suggest to get rid
of the light/dark green distinction altogether, do it like the new
menuconfig colors, they are much improved now. - Also removing the N and
replacing M by m has improved readability by a long way. (-:
> * Added fast-mode command to suppress side-effect computation
> on slow machines.
>
>I'd appreciate it if some of you with slow machines would try running
>with fast mode on and seeing if that addresses the sluggishness.
On my Pentium 133S with fastmode I get a more than 2 fold increase in speed
and it feels a lot more usable. Still have to wait between key presses but
it is better than before.
I also tried this on a Dual Celeron 450. Speed is fine but you can still
feel that something is happening in between the key press and it taking
effect. fastmode doesn't make much difference that I could feel there.
One general note: scrolling between entries (up/down arrow) seems slower
than it should be. It is noticeable when you want to scroll several entries
at once and hit an arrow key quickly several times in succession. Perhaps
the action taken after reaching an entry could be delayed until the next
key press and only then when it is not one of the move to next/prev option
ones? That should make moving up/down instantaneous like in the old (cml1)
menuconfig. But then I have no idea how cml2 works so maybe my suggestion
is bogus...
Keep up the good work. You are on the right track. (-:
Best regards,
Anton
--
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Linux NTFS Maintainer / WWW: http://sourceforge.net/projects/linux-ntfs/
ICQ: 8561279 / WWW: http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-15 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-15 3:45 Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-15 3:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-15 12:05 ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-15 20:55 ` Olaf Titz
2001-04-15 10:41 ` Anton Altaparmakov [this message]
2001-04-15 16:04 ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-16 6:15 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-04-16 6:25 ` Eric S. Raymond
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5.0.2.1.2.20010415112829.00b11ec0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk \
--to=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=esr@snark.thyrsus.com \
--cc=kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®