From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S267542AbRHGO6j>; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 10:58:39 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S266914AbRHGO63>; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 10:58:29 -0400
Received: from acmey.gatech.edu ([130.207.165.23]:27535 "EHLO acmey.gatech.edu")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S268017AbRHGO6Q>;
	Tue, 7 Aug 2001 10:58:16 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010807110412.00a8bec0@pop.prism.gatech.edu>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 11:06:36 -0400
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
From: David Maynor <david.maynor@oit.gatech.edu>
Subject: encrypted swap
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

But is the 10% perf hit really gaining you anything, expect to quell your 
paranoia. What is next, an encrypted /proc so that possible attackers can't 
gain information about running processes?

David Maynor