From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 21 May 2002 16:45:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 21 May 2002 16:45:24 -0400 Received: from ithilien.qualcomm.com ([129.46.51.59]:24213 "EHLO ithilien.qualcomm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 21 May 2002 16:44:50 -0400 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020521133408.068d2ef8@mail1.qualcomm.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 13:43:41 -0700 To: Greg KH From: "Maksim (Max) Krasnyanskiy" Subject: Re: What to do with all of the USB UHCI drivers in the kernel ? Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <20020521195925.GA2623@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > So basically I vote for usb-uhci. However some things will have to be > > fixed. We (Bluetooth folks) have couple > > of devices that refuse to work with usb-uhci (I didn't test the latest > > usb-uhci though). > >Sorry for the confusion, but both usb-uhci.c and uhci.c will be deleted >anyway :) I thought that usb-uhci-hcd and uhci-hcd are direct derivatives of usb-uhci and uhci (ie just minor API changes). And therefor perform exactly the same. >I am more interested in usb-uhci-hcd.c and uhci-hcd.c drivers, which both >showed up in 2.5.16. Yes they are based on the previous usb-uhci.c and >uhci.c drivers respectivly, but they are a bit different (they use the >hcd core code which reduces the size of the driver.) I see. Ok. I'll try 2.5.17 on one of my machines with UHCI controller. >You also might want to check out uhci.c again in 2.4.19-pre. It has had >a lot of previous bugs fixed and works _much_ better for me than before. Ok. Thanks Max