From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:15:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:15:14 -0500 Received: from numenor.qualcomm.com ([129.46.51.58]:12210 "EHLO numenor.qualcomm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:15:13 -0500 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030226121907.02206148@mail1.qualcomm.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:21:16 -0800 To: Rusty Russell From: Max Krasnyansky Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] New module refcounting for net_proto_family Cc: "David S. Miller" , Alexey Kuznetsov , Jean Tourrilhes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20030225050306.E53BC2C054@lists.samba.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At 09:02 PM 2/24/2003, Rusty Russell wrote: >In message <5.1.0.14.2.20030224112723.05a5e640@mail1.qualcomm.com> you write: >> appropriate name for that function. But I can live with __try_module_get() :) >> I'll make new patch for net/socket.c as soon as yours goes in. > >Linus, please apply. This is the "module_dup" which Viro wanted, by >another name. Rusty, Looks like Linus ignored this thread. He applied your other patches but not this one. Could please resend it with the new subject or something. Thanks Max