mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Subject: Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 11:29:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5.2.0.9.2.20030310112452.00ce87b8@pop.gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20030310105217.00cd25b0@pop.gmx.net>

At 11:05 AM 3/10/2003 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>At 08:12 PM 3/10/2003 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
>>On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 18:05, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> > At 01:29 PM 3/10/2003 +1100, you wrote:
>> > >Tried running contest on 2.5.64-mm2 and mm4 and had the same thing 
>> happen.
>> > > It will hang reliably during process_load. I tried not running
>> > > process_load but it would still get stuck in one of the other loads
>> > > (either a tar load or list load). I can simply stop contest at that 
>> stage
>> > > but then the machine wont work well hanging at the console after a 
>> minute
>> > > or so. This started at mm2 (doesn't happen with mm1).
>> > >
>> > >Here is the sysrq-p and sysrq-t output during process_load (which hangs
>> > > every time):
>> >
>> > hmm, the below looks interesting to me...
>> >
>> > >ksoftirqd/0   R C129A000     2      1             3       (L-TLB)
>> > >Call Trace:
>> > >  [<c0118f3e>] ksoftirqd+0x5e/0x9c
>> > >  [<c0118ee0>] ksoftirqd+0x0/0x9c
>> > >  [<c0106f1d>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xc
>> >
>> > I see that too with irman.  You could try renicing the shell you start
>> > contest from to >= +12.  With irman, what appears to be cpu starvation
>> > ceases to be a problem at exactly +12.  I also see kapmd constantly 
>> wanting
>> > to run but not being serviced.
>>
>>Contest uses a modified process load from irman so it exhibits similar
>>behaviour. Not sure what +12 actually tells me though :-(
>
>Aha!  No wonder your symptoms look so similar.  +12 is just a magic number 
>that works... found by trusty old trial and error method.  What I wanted 
>to see was if your hang would also go away with the same magic number, or 
>if renicing with any value helped you at all.
>
>>My simplistic understanding is that the pipe task in process_load gets
>>constantly elevated as "interactive" by the new scheduler, and nothing else
>>ever happens.
>
>Appears so.  I can make it "work" by doing a dinky (butt ugly:) tweak in 
>activate_task().

Oh, what the heck.  Even a butt ugly patch that works has informational 
value.  Can you try the attached please?  If it works for you too, maybe 
it'll tell Ingo something.

The numbers irman spits out with this (cough cough) patch are mucho better 
than stock, and better than the ones I get once in a while when it (rare) 
doesn't starve me to death with combo.

         -Mike 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-03-10 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <5.2.0.9.2.20030310075720.00c832f8@pop.gmx.net>
2003-03-10  9:12 ` Con Kolivas
2003-03-10 10:05   ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-10 10:21     ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-10 10:29     ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2003-03-10 10:27       ` Con Kolivas
2003-03-12  9:21       ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-12 10:25         ` Con Kolivas
2003-03-12 10:37           ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-12 11:19             ` Con Kolivas
2003-03-12 12:30               ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-13  1:22                 ` Con Kolivas
2003-03-13  3:39                   ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-13  4:31                     ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-10 10:31     ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-10 10:31       ` Con Kolivas
2003-03-10 10:43         ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-10 10:42           ` Con Kolivas
2003-03-10 10:54             ` Mike Galbraith
     [not found] <fa.ie98jja.2hkdj6@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.j59micm.1fhqe9k@ifi.uio.no>
2003-03-10 12:43   ` Ed Tomlinson
2003-03-10 12:47     ` Con Kolivas
2003-03-10 13:41     ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-10 13:41       ` Ed Tomlinson
2003-03-10 14:12         ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-10 14:04     ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-10  2:29 Con Kolivas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5.2.0.9.2.20030310112452.00ce87b8@pop.gmx.net \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®