From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262830AbTFTKws (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2003 06:52:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262850AbTFTKws (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2003 06:52:48 -0400 Received: from pop.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:62623 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262830AbTFTKwr (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2003 06:52:47 -0400 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030620130623.00ceff70@pop.gmx.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 13:09:37 +0200 To: Con Kolivas From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [PATCH] sleep_decay for interactivity 2.5.72 - testers needed Cc: Andreas Boman , linux kernel mailing list In-Reply-To: <200306201229.55425.kernel@kolivas.org> References: <1056058342.917.69.camel@asgaard.midgaard.us> <5.2.0.9.2.20030619171843.02299e00@pop.gmx.net> <200306200250.01865.kernel@kolivas.org> <1056058342.917.69.camel@asgaard.midgaard.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At 12:29 PM 6/20/2003 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: >On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 07:32, Andreas Boman wrote: > > > > Basicly, for normal usage this kernel is acting *very* well here. > >Great! Thanks for doing this testing. I've attached a patch with the updated >figures and cc'ed lkml for others to test. Thud is still much more effective at starvation than stock (zero decay during run phase), and a parallel kernel build still goes to max-interactive virtually instantly. -Mike