mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Satchell <list@fluent2.pyramid.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Profiling disk usage on selected branches of a file system
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 05:58:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.0.20031007054856.019687a8@fluent2.pyramid.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031007130551.36899cd9.MalteSch@gmx.de>

I have a number of servers that are disk-bound, and I'm trying to convince 
the boss to split out the single disk drive to separate disk drives to 
increase I/O throughput.  I've been using VMSTAT to show just how 
disk-bound we are, but I can't get any traction toward using multiple 
drives until I can show a clear, positive, and immediate benefit.

Searching the archives, I didn't see discussion of methods of monitoring 
separate parts of a file system, other than building separate partitions 
and using /proc/partitions to measure what happens there.  This isn't an 
option.  (There is some political inertia here, as well as a heavy dose of 
NIH.)

Any help welcome.

My hypothesis:  we need three separate drives, one for OS/code/swap/logs, 
one for /home (Web pages, scripts, and user data), and one devoted to 
MySQL/PostgreSQL.  The "right" way to do the job would be to have the 
databases on a completely separate computer, but that's out because of 
proprietary-software issues.

You can see the Catch-22.

Put together a single server to try the concept?  "Please, you must be 
joking,   Our servers are working just fine!"

grumble grumble NIH grumble grumble

Satch


  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-07 13:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-06 13:29 3c59x on 2.6.0-test3->test6 slow Domen Puncer
2003-10-06 21:23 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-10-06 22:33   ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-06 22:43     ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-10-06 23:44       ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-07  0:18         ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-10-07  4:31           ` Malte Schröder
2003-10-07 11:05             ` Malte Schröder
2003-10-07 12:58               ` Stephen Satchell [this message]
2003-10-07  7:49           ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-07 23:43             ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-10-08 15:05               ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-09  1:53                 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-10-09  8:49                   ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-09 23:10                     ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-10-09 23:55                       ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-13  0:22                         ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-13  0:37                           ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-13  2:28                             ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-13  3:03                               ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5.2.1.1.0.20031007054856.019687a8@fluent2.pyramid.net \
    --to=list@fluent2.pyramid.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®