From: Stephen Satchell <list@fluent2.pyramid.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Profiling disk usage on selected branches of a file system
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 05:58:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.0.20031007054856.019687a8@fluent2.pyramid.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031007130551.36899cd9.MalteSch@gmx.de>
I have a number of servers that are disk-bound, and I'm trying to convince
the boss to split out the single disk drive to separate disk drives to
increase I/O throughput. I've been using VMSTAT to show just how
disk-bound we are, but I can't get any traction toward using multiple
drives until I can show a clear, positive, and immediate benefit.
Searching the archives, I didn't see discussion of methods of monitoring
separate parts of a file system, other than building separate partitions
and using /proc/partitions to measure what happens there. This isn't an
option. (There is some political inertia here, as well as a heavy dose of
NIH.)
Any help welcome.
My hypothesis: we need three separate drives, one for OS/code/swap/logs,
one for /home (Web pages, scripts, and user data), and one devoted to
MySQL/PostgreSQL. The "right" way to do the job would be to have the
databases on a completely separate computer, but that's out because of
proprietary-software issues.
You can see the Catch-22.
Put together a single server to try the concept? "Please, you must be
joking, Our servers are working just fine!"
grumble grumble NIH grumble grumble
Satch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-07 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-06 13:29 3c59x on 2.6.0-test3->test6 slow Domen Puncer
2003-10-06 21:23 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-10-06 22:33 ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-06 22:43 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-10-06 23:44 ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-07 0:18 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-10-07 4:31 ` Malte Schröder
2003-10-07 11:05 ` Malte Schröder
2003-10-07 12:58 ` Stephen Satchell [this message]
2003-10-07 7:49 ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-07 23:43 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-10-08 15:05 ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-09 1:53 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-10-09 8:49 ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-09 23:10 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-10-09 23:55 ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-13 0:22 ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-13 0:37 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-13 2:28 ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-13 3:03 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5.2.1.1.0.20031007054856.019687a8@fluent2.pyramid.net \
--to=list@fluent2.pyramid.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®