Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] hwmon: (emc1403) Convert to use OF bindings

[Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>]

On 7/28/26 14:44, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2026 at 07:23:13AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 7/25/26 06:24, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
>>> чт, 23 лип. 2026 р. о 09:28 Uwe Kleine-König
>>> <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com> пише:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 12:59:34PM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
>>>>> From: Jonas Schwöbel <jonasschwoebel@yahoo.de>
>>>>>
>>>>> Add OF match compatible table to be able to use this driver with Device
>>>>> Trees.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jonas Schwöbel <jonasschwoebel@yahoo.de>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@gmail.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>>>
>>>> Please put your S-o-b line last.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If S-o-b's should be chronological, then this order is correct.
>>> Guenter added his reviewed-by after I have added my signed-off-by.
> 
> It's a nitpick, but as you added Guenter's tag, you modified the commit
> log and then your S-o-b has to be renewed.
> 
>> That refers to S-o-B, not to Reviewed-by: trailers.
>>
>> Do we really have to argue about something like this ? Do I have
>> to mandate the order of non-SoB trailers for this subsystem ?
> 
> I wouldn't have replied just for the order, but I think it's convenient
> and usual to have the own S-o-b last.
> 
> Depends on you how strict you want to be here, as usual. I for my part
> ask for reordering or announce to fix the ordering if nothing else is in
> the way for application.
> 
FWIW, my feedback wasn't directed at you.

Guenter