From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753637Ab3E1S4J (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2013 14:56:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:17128 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752798Ab3E1S4H (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2013 14:56:07 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <20130528143409.9790.41260.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Linus Torvalds Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Al Viro , linux-am33-list@redhat.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ken Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] MN10300: Fix ret_from_kernel_thread Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 19:56:03 +0100 Message-ID: <5007.1369767363@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > What kernel version are these patches against? > > You explicitly mention commit ddf23e87a804, but the patch contains > ret_from_kernel_execve that was *removed* by that commit. > > So the whole thing seems very confused. I'm dropping this series. Sorry about that. It seems I pulled your master branch from my upstream tree rather than your upstream tree. David