From: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Darren Hart <darren@dvhart.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: 3.5-rc6 futex_wait_requeue_pi oops.
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:10:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <500974CD.7090804@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120720133501.GA30826@redhat.com>
On 07/20/2012 06:35 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:53:45PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>
>
> > >> I'll add a fix to that WARN_ON in my futex-fixes branch along with the
> > >> fix for the bug Dan found.
> > >
> > > I think I have root cause. futex_wait_requeue_pi() doesn't like having
> > > uaddr == uaddr2. The handle_early_wakeup() doesn't detect a problem
> > > because key2 IS the same as key1, I think. I've just discovered this and
> > > quickly hacked in a "if (uaddr==uaddr2) return -EINVAL" fix and the test
> > > continues to run (with just ops 0, 11, 12) for several minutes now
> > > (typically fails in a few seconds). I'll let it run for a few hours and
> > > contemplate the proper fix.
> >
> > Dave, mind giving this a spin? It seems to be doing the trick here,
> > at least for the *REQUEUE_PI futex op codes in trinity.
>
> Yeah, looks like that does the trick!
It ran all night without an issue here too. I'll roll these up and send
them out shortly.
Dave, I love/hate trinity. ;-)
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-20 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-13 18:08 Dave Jones
2012-07-13 18:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-07-13 18:54 ` Dave Jones
2012-07-13 19:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-07-13 19:56 ` Dave Jones
[not found] ` <CAGChsmNnE_iEKWagULzewSPWsAbaA2A-mXg4CS+vyG3a8Pbj1A@mail.gmail.com>
2012-07-13 20:54 ` Dave Jones
2012-07-19 23:22 ` Darren Hart
2012-07-20 0:37 ` Darren Hart
2012-07-20 6:53 ` Darren Hart
2012-07-20 13:35 ` Dave Jones
2012-07-20 15:10 ` Darren Hart [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=500974CD.7090804@linux.intel.com \
--to=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome