mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Darren Hart <darren@dvhart.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: 3.5-rc6 futex_wait_requeue_pi oops.
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:10:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <500974CD.7090804@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120720133501.GA30826@redhat.com>



On 07/20/2012 06:35 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:53:45PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> 
>  
>  > >> I'll add a fix to that WARN_ON in my futex-fixes branch along with the
>  > >> fix for the bug Dan found.
>  > > 
>  > > I think I have root cause. futex_wait_requeue_pi() doesn't like having
>  > > uaddr == uaddr2. The handle_early_wakeup() doesn't detect a problem
>  > > because key2 IS the same as key1, I think. I've just discovered this and
>  > > quickly hacked in a "if (uaddr==uaddr2) return -EINVAL" fix and the test
>  > > continues to run (with just ops 0, 11, 12) for several minutes now
>  > > (typically fails in a few seconds). I'll let it run for a few hours and
>  > > contemplate the proper fix.
>  > 
>  > Dave, mind giving this a spin? It seems to be doing the trick here,
>  > at least for the *REQUEUE_PI futex op codes in trinity.
> 
> Yeah, looks like that does the trick!

It ran all night without an issue here too. I'll roll these up and send
them out shortly.

Dave, I love/hate trinity. ;-)

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel



      reply	other threads:[~2012-07-20 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-13 18:08 Dave Jones
2012-07-13 18:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-07-13 18:54   ` Dave Jones
2012-07-13 19:11     ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-07-13 19:56       ` Dave Jones
     [not found]         ` <CAGChsmNnE_iEKWagULzewSPWsAbaA2A-mXg4CS+vyG3a8Pbj1A@mail.gmail.com>
2012-07-13 20:54           ` Dave Jones
2012-07-19 23:22     ` Darren Hart
2012-07-20  0:37       ` Darren Hart
2012-07-20  6:53         ` Darren Hart
2012-07-20 13:35           ` Dave Jones
2012-07-20 15:10             ` Darren Hart [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=500974CD.7090804@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome