From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752457Ab2GZLgq (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jul 2012 07:36:46 -0400 Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:57055 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751758Ab2GZLgp (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jul 2012 07:36:45 -0400 Message-ID: <50112BC9.1070100@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:36:41 +0100 From: Lee Jones User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Brown CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de, sameo@linux.intel.com, olalilja@yahoo.se, ola.o.lilja@stericsson.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, lrg@ti.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] Some fixes and DT enablement for ux500 audio References: <1343298534-13611-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20120726112848.GX3099@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> In-Reply-To: <20120726112848.GX3099@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 26/07/12 12:28, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:28:33AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: >> This patch-set sees some code reinforcement surrounding the recently >> accepted MOP500 MSP, PCM, AB8500 CODEC and ux500 Audio Machine Driver. >> It contains some extra error checking pertaining to the ux500 specific >> drivers themselves, along with bugfixes for issues in core SoC Audio >> code happened upon along the way. There are also a couple of minor >> clean-ups relating to ux500 platform code, which are hitching a ride >> for ease of status tracking. > > Please restructure this so that the actual error fixes (which should go > into 3.6) are before the random cleanups (which should go into 3.7) > rather than mixing them together. I can. > It'd also be helpful if you could > split out changes to the different subsystems separately when there's no > overlap (which mostly looks to be the case here). I can to this too, but you will still have overlap between arch/arm and sound/soc. The only other subsystem in the patch-set is MFD. -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog