From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752891Ab2G0Kdf (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2012 06:33:35 -0400 Received: from nat28.tlf.novell.com ([130.57.49.28]:54529 "EHLO nat28.tlf.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751917Ab2G0Kde convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2012 06:33:34 -0400 Message-Id: <50128A9B0200007800090EFB@nat28.tlf.novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 12.0.0 Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:33:31 +0100 From: "Jan Beulich" To: "Ian Campbell" Cc: "Ian Jackson" , "xen-devel" , "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH] Boot PV guests with more than 128GB (v1) for 3.7 References: <1343335652-5659-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> <501260980200007800090E08@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <1343383205.6812.137.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <501286E50200007800090ECB@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <1343384489.6812.143.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> In-Reply-To: <1343384489.6812.143.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> On 27.07.12 at 12:21, Ian Campbell wrote: > I was actually think of the issue with 32 bit PV guests accessing MFN > space > 160G, even if they are themselves small, which is a separate > concern. That can be made work if really needed, but not via the mechanism we're talking about here. The question is whether it's worth it. Jan