mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@in.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakaynahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	stan_shebs@mentor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] uprobes: remove check for uprobe variable in handle_swbp()
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 11:35:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <502232DE.30702@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50222D11.4010005@in.ibm.com>

On 08/08/2012 11:10 AM, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
>> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
>> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
>> @@ -1528,17 +1528,15 @@ cleanup_ret:
>> utask->active_uprobe = NULL;
>> utask->state = UTASK_RUNNING;
>> }
>> - if (uprobe) {
>> - if (!(uprobe->flags & UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP))
>> + if (!(uprobe->flags & UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP))
>>
> Shouldn't we check uprobe != NULL before we check the uprobe->flags ?
> i.e, shouldn't the above line be :
>
> if (uprobe && ! (uprobe->flags & UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP)) ?

The function starts like this:

          if (!uprobe) {
                  if (is_swbp > 0) {
                          send_sig(SIGTRAP, current, 0);
                  } else {
                          instruction_pointer_set(regs, bp_vaddr);
                  }
                  return;
          }

Which makes uprobe != NULL by the time we get there, no?

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-08  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-07 16:12 uprobe: single step over uprobe & global breakpoints Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-07 16:12 ` [PATCH 1/5] uprobes: Use a helper instead of ptrace's single step enable Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-07 16:12 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86/uprobes: implement x86 specific arch_uprobe_*_step Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-08 12:57   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-08 13:17     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-08 14:53       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-08 15:02         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-09  4:43         ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-08-09 17:09           ` [PATCH v2 " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-13 13:24             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-14  8:28               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-14 14:27                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-20 10:47                   ` [PATCH v3] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-22 14:03                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-22 14:11                       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-22 15:59                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-29 17:37                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-30  8:47                             ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-08-30 11:18                               ` [PATCH] x86/uprobes: don't disable single stepping if it was already on Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-30 14:37                               ` [PATCH v3] x86/uprobes: implement x86 specific arch_uprobe_*_step Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-30 15:03                                 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-08-30 15:11                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-07 16:12 ` [PATCH 3/5] uprobes: remove check for uprobe variable in handle_swbp() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-08  9:10   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2012-08-08  9:35     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2012-08-10  5:23       ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2012-08-08 12:58   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-07 16:12 ` [PATCH 4/5] uprobes: probe definiton can only start with 'p' and '-' Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-07 16:12 ` [RFC 5/5] uprobes: add global breakpoints Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-08 13:14   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-09 17:18     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-13 13:16       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-14 11:43         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-13 11:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 15:26     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-21 19:42     ` [RFC 5/5 v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-22 13:48       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-27 18:56         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-29 15:49           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-30 20:42             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=502232DE.30702@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=stan_shebs@mentor.com \
    --cc=suzuki@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome