mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] ftrace: Do not test frame pointers if -mfentry is used
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 11:58:58 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50232772.4070102@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344430148.6935.17.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>

(2012/08/08 21:49), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 13:34 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>  
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST) && !defined(CC_USING_FENTRY)
>>
>> I think CONFIG_HAVE_FENTRY would better unselect
>> CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST in arch/x86/Kconfig explicitly.
> 
> No, CONFIG_HAVE_FENTRY just means fentry is supported, it does not mean
> that it is being used. It only gets used if CC_USING_FENTRY is set,
> which is set by the Makefile at time of compile.
> 
> If CONFIG_HAVE_FENTRY is defined, a test is done to see if the gcc
> compiling the kernel supports -mfentry. If it does, then it defines the
> CC_USING_FENTRY macro, if not, the macro is not defined and the old way
> is performed.
> 
> If the old way is performed, even if CONFIG_HAVE_FENTRY is defined, then
> we still need the above test. We can not have CONFIG_HAVE_FENTRY
> unselect CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST.

Ah, I see. OK, I don't see any other issue.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com



  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-09  2:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-07 19:38 [RFC PATCH 0/4] ftrace: Add use of -mfentry for x86_64 Steven Rostedt
2012-08-07 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] ftrace: Make recordmcount.c handle __fentry__ Steven Rostedt
2012-08-07 23:57   ` John Reiser
2012-08-08  0:05     ` Steven Rostedt
2012-08-27 17:03   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2012-08-07 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] ftrace: Add -mfentry to Makefile on function tracer Steven Rostedt
2012-08-27 17:04   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2012-08-07 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] ftrace: Do not test frame pointers if -mfentry is used Steven Rostedt
2012-08-08  4:34   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-08-08 12:49     ` Steven Rostedt
2012-08-09  2:58       ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2012-08-09  3:45       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-09  3:57         ` Steven Rostedt
2012-08-09  4:15         ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-09 12:37         ` Andi Kleen
2012-08-27 17:05   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2012-08-07 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] ftrace/x86: Add support for -mfentry to x86_64 Steven Rostedt
2012-08-09  8:34   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-08-09 13:46   ` Steven Rostedt
2012-08-09 13:48     ` Steven Rostedt
2012-08-10  7:45     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-08-27 17:06   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2012-08-07 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] ftrace: Add use of -mfentry for x86_64 H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-13  8:42   ` Ingo Molnar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-09 20:02 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] ftrace: Use -mfentry when supported (this is for x86_64 right now) Steven Rostedt
2011-02-09 20:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] ftrace: Do not test frame pointers if -mfentry is used Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50232772.4070102@hitachi.com \
    --to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome