mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tj@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	ebiederm@xmission.com, josh@joshtriplett.org,
	David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, palves@redhat.com, rmallon@gmail.com,
	bfields@fieldses.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:18:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <504DDAAB.7090001@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120910024813.GA32008@Krystal>

On 09/10/2012 04:48 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Sasha Levin (levinsasha928@gmail.com) wrote:
>> +#define hash_init(hashtable)							\
>> +({										\
>> +	int __i;								\
>> +										\
>> +	for (__i = 0; __i < HASH_BITS(hashtable); __i++)			\
>> +		INIT_HLIST_HEAD(hashtable + __i);				\
> 
> I suspect that hashtable will be a pointer, and you use the "+" operator
> to do an offset on this pointer. Any thought on using:
> 
>             INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&hashtable[__i]);
> 
> instead ? It would provide the same result, but would ensure that the
> user is indeed passing a pointer, and not an integer.

It also looks nicer :)

> Also, why isn't it a static inline ? I'm probably missing something. If
> there is a reason why it needs to stay a #define, please document it in
> the comment.

It's a define because it needs to get the size of the hashtable.

I'll document that.


Thanks,
Sasha

      reply	other threads:[~2012-09-10 12:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-09 12:52 Sasha Levin
2012-09-10  2:48 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-09-10 12:18   ` Sasha Levin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=504DDAAB.7090001@gmail.com \
    --to=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=rmallon@gmail.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome