From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758650Ab2IJUWz (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:22:55 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:20107 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758356Ab2IJUWx (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:22:53 -0400 Message-ID: <504E4C0E.9030402@jonmasters.org> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:22:38 -0400 From: Jon Masters Organization: World Organi{s,z}ation of Broken Dreams User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Catalin Marinas CC: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/31] AArch64 Linux kernel port References: <1347035226-18649-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <1347035226-18649-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/07/2012 12:26 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > This is the 3rd version of patches implementing Linux kernel support for > the 64-bit ARM architecture. > ...but the main goal was to freeze the user ABI. Is the consensus now that we're good from an ABI viewpoint? Jon.