From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 1024s!
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:50:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <504FCE48.1050409@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120911234130.GA13382@localhost>
On 09/11/2012 04:41 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:06:33AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>> On 09/09/2012 12:59 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>>> Hi John,
>>>
>>> The below lockup warning pops up very occasionally in kvm guest
>>> kernels and it's bisected down to
>>>
>>> commit 2a8c0883c3cfffcc148ea606e2a4e7453cd75e73
>>> Author: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
>>> Date: Fri Jul 13 01:21:56 2012 -0400
>>>
>>> time: Move xtime_nsec adjustment underflow handling timekeeping_adjust
>>>
>>> [ 8.340327] Freeing unused kernel memory: 460k freed
>>> [ 1107.515496] [sched_delayed] sched: RT throttling activated
>>> [ 1107.516439] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 1024s! [swapper/1:0]
>>
>> Thanks so much for sending this. One detail I'm curious about is
>> that these kernels from the Bug messages seem to be v3.6-rc1 or
>> earlier.
>>
>> Ingo had a fix 1d17d17484d40f2d5b35c79518597a2b25296996 ("time: Fix
>> adjustment cleanup bug in timekeeping_adjust") that landed in
>> 3.6-rc2
>>
>> Has this issue actually been seen on a 3.6-rc2+ kernel?
> Nope. I tested -rc5 for 10000+ boots and it's obviously free from the bug.
> Sorry for the noise!
No worries. Thanks so much for following up on this, and your continued
testing!
-john
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-11 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-09 7:59 Fengguang Wu
2012-09-10 17:06 ` John Stultz
2012-09-11 23:41 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-11 23:50 ` John Stultz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=504FCE48.1050409@linaro.org \
--to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome