Re: [PATCH] USB: phy: re-organize tegra phy driver

[Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>]

On 09/12/2012 09:49 PM, Venu Byravarasu wrote:
> Stephen Warren wrote at Thursday, September 13, 2012 12:06 AM:
>> On 09/12/2012 04:58 AM, Venu Byravarasu wrote:
>>> Nvidia produces several Tegra SOCs viz Tegra2, Tegra3 etc.
>>> In order to support USB phy drivers on these SOCs, existing
>>> phy driver is split into SOC agnostic common USB phy driver and
>>> tegra2 specific USB phy driver.
>>> This will facilitate easy addition & deletion of phy drivers for
>>> Tegra SOCs.
>>
>> For capitalization/related reasons, I would re-write the commit
>> description as:
>>
>> NVIDIA produces several Tegra SoCs viz Tegra20, Tegra30 etc.
>> In order to support USB PHY drivers on these SoCs, existing
> 
> Will change tegra2 to Tegra20 and similar for Tegra30 & NVIDIA.
> However as phy is not an acronym, should we still have it in Caps?

I'd certainly expect to see PHY in all-caps, yes. As entirely arbitrary
justification, see the precedent at:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PHY_(chip)

Sorry for bike-shedding, but I'm picky about that kind of thing, at
least sometimes.