mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@gmail.com>
To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
Cc: saurav.girepunje@hotmail.com, fabioaiuto83@gmail.com,
	ross.schm.dev@gmail.com, marcocesati@gmail.com,
	insafonov@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: os_dep: simplify the return statement.
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 23:47:00 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50527d62-3c4e-3b61-5f17-225379c1d6c3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1661874.ovfstkzlfj@localhost.localdomain>



On 09/10/21 10:29 pm, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> On Saturday, October 9, 2021 5:39:12 PM CEST Saurav Girepunje wrote:
>> Remove the unneeded and redundant check of variable on goto out.
>> Simplify the return using multiple goto label to avoid
>> unneeded check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   .../staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c | 29 ++++++++++---------
>>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c b/drivers/
> staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c
>> index 0868f56e2979..574fdb6adce7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c
>> @@ -2282,18 +2282,18 @@ static int rtw_cfg80211_add_monitor_if(struct
> adapter *padapter, char *name, str
>>
>>   	if (!name) {
>>   		ret = -EINVAL;
>> -		goto out;
>> +		goto err_out;
>>   	}
>>
>>   	if (pwdev_priv->pmon_ndev) {
>>   		ret = -EBUSY;
>> -		goto out;
>> +		goto err_out;
>>   	}
>>
>>   	mon_ndev = alloc_etherdev(sizeof(struct
> rtw_netdev_priv_indicator));
>>   	if (!mon_ndev) {
>>   		ret = -ENOMEM;
>> -		goto out;
>> +		goto err_out;
>>   	}
>>
>>   	mon_ndev->type = ARPHRD_IEEE80211_RADIOTAP;
>> @@ -2312,7 +2312,7 @@ static int rtw_cfg80211_add_monitor_if(struct adapter
> *padapter, char *name, str
>>   	mon_wdev = rtw_zmalloc(sizeof(struct wireless_dev));
>>   	if (!mon_wdev) {
>>   		ret = -ENOMEM;
>> -		goto out;
>> +		goto err_zmalloc;
>>   	}
>>
>>   	mon_wdev->wiphy = padapter->rtw_wdev->wiphy;
>> @@ -2322,22 +2322,23 @@ static int rtw_cfg80211_add_monitor_if(struct
> adapter *padapter, char *name, str
>>
>>   	ret = cfg80211_register_netdevice(mon_ndev);
>>   	if (ret) {
>> -		goto out;
>> +		goto err_register;
>>   	}
>>
>>   	*ndev = pwdev_priv->pmon_ndev = mon_ndev;
>>   	memcpy(pwdev_priv->ifname_mon, name, IFNAMSIZ+1);
>>
>> -out:
>> -	if (ret && mon_wdev) {
>> -		kfree(mon_wdev);
>> -		mon_wdev = NULL;
>> -	}
>> +err_register:
>>
>> -	if (ret && mon_ndev) {
>> -		free_netdev(mon_ndev);
>> -		*ndev = mon_ndev = NULL;
>> -	}
>> +	kfree(mon_wdev);
>> +	mon_wdev = NULL;
>> +
>> +err_zmalloc:
>> +
>> +	free_netdev(mon_ndev);
>> +	*ndev = mon_ndev = NULL;
>> +
>> +err_out:
>>
>>   	return ret;
>>   }
>> --
>> 2.32.0
>>
> At a quick look it seems that now you unconditionally free memory and free a
> network device immediately after the last memcpy().
> 
> Why are you doing this even if no errors are returned from device and memory
> allocations (i.e., while "ret" is still equal to zero)?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Fabio
>   
> 
> 
> 

Thanks Fabio for review. Yes, That is missed.
I can do that in either one of the way.
Either I should check for ret before free or I should use goto out(may 
be I will rename err_out goto label to "out" only) just after the memcpy 
statement so that function will not free for no error case and return 
ret value only.

Please let me know you input on above.

Regards,
Saurav Girepunje

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-09 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-09 15:39 Saurav Girepunje
2021-10-09 16:59 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-10-09 18:17   ` Saurav Girepunje [this message]
2021-10-11 12:26 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-10-11 18:26   ` Saurav Girepunje
2021-10-12  6:34     ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50527d62-3c4e-3b61-5f17-225379c1d6c3@gmail.com \
    --to=saurav.girepunje@gmail.com \
    --cc=fabioaiuto83@gmail.com \
    --cc=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=insafonov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=marcocesati@gmail.com \
    --cc=ross.schm.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=saurav.girepunje@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®