mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maran Wilson <maran.wilson@oracle.com>
To: x86@kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, jgross@suse.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, bp@suse.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
	kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, luto@kernel.org,
	mchehab@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org,
	thomas.lendacky@amd.com, hch@infradead.org, roger.pau@citrix.com,
	rkrcmar@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] KVM: x86: Allow Qemu/KVM to use PVH entry point
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 13:27:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <505290b7-416f-cc97-35ff-e416ceb532c2@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1523920175-27287-1-git-send-email-maran.wilson@oracle.com>

Friendly ping. I am hopeful one of the x86 and/or KVM maintainers has a 
few cycles to spare to look this over.

And thanks to everyone who has helped thus far by providing valuable 
feedback and reviewing.

    https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/16/1002

Thanks,
-Maran

On 4/16/2018 4:09 PM, Maran Wilson wrote:
> For certain applications it is desirable to rapidly boot a KVM virtual
> machine. In cases where legacy hardware and software support within the
> guest is not needed, Qemu should be able to boot directly into the
> uncompressed Linux kernel binary without the need to run firmware.
>
> There already exists an ABI to allow this for Xen PVH guests and the ABI
> is supported by Linux and FreeBSD:
>
>     https://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/misc/pvh.html
>
> This patch series would enable Qemu to use that same entry point for
> booting KVM guests.
>
> Changes from v6:
>
>   * Addressed issues caught by the kbuild test robot:
>      - Restored an #include line that had been dropped by mistake (patch 4)
>      - Removed a pair of #include lines that were no longer needed in a
>        common code file and causing problems for certain 32-bit configs
>        (patchs 4 and 7)
>
> Changes from v5:
>
>   * The interface changes to the x86/HVM start info layout have
>     now been accepted into the Xen tree.
>   * Rebase and merge upstream PVH file changes.
>   * (Patch 6) Synced up to the final version of the header file that was
>               acked and pulled into the Xen tree.
>   * (Patch 1) Fixed typo and removed redundant "def_bool n" line.
>
> Changes from v4:
>
> Note: I've withheld Juergen's earlier "Reviewed-by" tags from patches
> 1 and 7 since there were minor changes (mostly just addition of
> CONFIG_KVM_GUEST_PVH as requested) that came afterwards.
>
>   * Changed subject prefix from RFC to PATCH
>   * Added CONFIG_KVM_GUEST_PVH as suggested
>   * Relocated the PVH common files to
>     arch/x86/platform/pvh/{enlighten.c,head.S}
>   * Realized I also needed to move the objtool override for those files
>   * Updated a few code comments per reviewer feedback
>   * Sent out a patch of the hvm_start_info struct changes against the Xen
>     tree since that is the canonical copy of the header. Discussions on
>     that thread have resulted in some (non-functional) updates to
>     start_info.h (patch 6/7) and those changes are reflected here as well
>     in order to keep the files in sync. The header file has since been
>     ack'ed for the Xen tree by Jan Beulich.
>
> Changes from v3:
>
>   * Implemented Juergen's suggestion for refactoring and moving the PVH
>     code so that CONFIG_XEN is no longer required for booting KVM guests
>     via the PVH entry point.
>     Functionally, nothing has changed from V3 really, but the patches
>     look completely different now because of all the code movement and
>     refactoring. Some of these patches can be combined, but I've left
>     them very small in some cases to make the refactoring and code
>     movement easier to review.
>     My approach for refactoring has been to create a PVH entry layer that
>     still has understanding and knowledge about Xen vs non-Xen guest types
>     so that it can make run time decisions to handle either case, as
>     opposed to going all the way and re-writing it to be a completely
>     hypervisor agnostic and architecturally pure layer that is separate
>     from guest type details. The latter seemed a bit overkill in this
>     situation. And I've handled the complexity of having to support
>     Qemu/KVM boot of kernels compiled with or without CONFIG_XEN via a
>     pair of xen specific __weak routines that can be overridden in kernels
>     that support Xen guests. Importantly, the __weak routines are for
>     xen specific code only (not generic "guest type" specific code) so
>     there is no clashing between xen version of the strong routine and,
>     say, a KVM version of the same routine. But I'm sure there are many
>     ways to skin this cat, so I'm open to alternate suggestions if there
>     is a compelling reason for not using __weak in this situation.
>
> Changes from v2:
>
>   * All structures (including memory map table entries) are padded and
>     aligned to an 8 byte boundary.
>
>   * Removed the "packed" attributes and made changes to comments as
>     suggested by Jan.
>
> Changes from v1:
>
>   * Adopted Paolo's suggestion for defining a v2 PVH ABI that includes the
>     e820 map instead of using the second module entry to pass the table.
>
>   * Cleaned things up a bit to reduce the number of xen vs non-xen special
>     cases.
>
>
> Maran Wilson (7):
>    xen/pvh: Split CONFIG_XEN_PVH into CONFIG_PVH and CONFIG_XEN_PVH
>    xen/pvh: Move PVH entry code out of Xen specific tree
>    xen/pvh: Create a new file for Xen specific PVH code
>    xen/pvh: Move Xen specific PVH VM initialization out of common file
>    xen/pvh: Move Xen code for getting mem map via hcall out of common
>      file
>    xen/pvh: Add memory map pointer to hvm_start_info struct
>    KVM: x86: Allow Qemu/KVM to use PVH entry point
>
>   MAINTAINERS                                     |   1 +
>   arch/x86/Kbuild                                 |   2 +
>   arch/x86/Kconfig                                |  14 +++
>   arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S                       |   2 +-
>   arch/x86/platform/pvh/Makefile                  |   5 +
>   arch/x86/platform/pvh/enlighten.c               | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   arch/x86/{xen/xen-pvh.S => platform/pvh/head.S} |   0
>   arch/x86/xen/Kconfig                            |   3 +-
>   arch/x86/xen/Makefile                           |   2 -
>   arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c                    |  93 +++-------------
>   include/xen/interface/hvm/start_info.h          |  63 ++++++++++-
>   11 files changed, 240 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 arch/x86/platform/pvh/Makefile
>   create mode 100644 arch/x86/platform/pvh/enlighten.c
>   rename arch/x86/{xen/xen-pvh.S => platform/pvh/head.S} (100%)
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-16 20:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-16 23:09 Maran Wilson
2018-04-16 23:11 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] xen/pvh: Split CONFIG_XEN_PVH into CONFIG_PVH and CONFIG_XEN_PVH Maran Wilson
2018-04-17  6:18   ` Juergen Gross
2018-04-16 23:11 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] xen/pvh: Move PVH entry code out of Xen specific tree Maran Wilson
2018-04-17  6:24   ` Juergen Gross
2018-04-16 23:12 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] xen/pvh: Create a new file for Xen specific PVH code Maran Wilson
2018-04-17  6:29   ` Juergen Gross
2018-04-16 23:12 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] xen/pvh: Move Xen specific PVH VM initialization out of common file Maran Wilson
2018-04-16 23:12 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] xen/pvh: Move Xen code for getting mem map via hcall " Maran Wilson
2018-04-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] xen/pvh: Add memory map pointer to hvm_start_info struct Maran Wilson
2018-04-17  6:30   ` Juergen Gross
2018-04-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] KVM: x86: Allow Qemu/KVM to use PVH entry point Maran Wilson
2018-04-17  6:41   ` Juergen Gross
2018-04-18  8:11 ` [PATCH v7 0/7] " Linus Walleij
2018-05-02 21:37   ` Maran Wilson
2018-05-16 20:27 ` Maran Wilson [this message]
2018-05-18 11:31   ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-05-23 16:56     ` Maran Wilson
2018-11-16 10:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-11-16 17:17   ` Maran Wilson
2018-11-19 18:25     ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=505290b7-416f-cc97-35ff-e416ceb532c2@oracle.com \
    --to=maran.wilson@oracle.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome