mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Witold Szczeponik <Witold.Szczeponik@gmx.net>
To: bhelgaas@google.com, lenb@kernel.org
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/3] PNP: Allow PNP resources to be disabled (interface)
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:57:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <507AE0D8.6090909@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <506C6065.3070202@gmx.net>

On 03/10/12 17:57, Witold Szczeponik wrote:

[...]

> 
> Len and Bjorn, 
> 
> any chances to include the patches in 3.7?  I checked them 
> against 3.6 and they applied without any change.  Or should 
> I resend them individually? 
> 
> Thanks. 
> 
> --- Witold
> 

Hi Len, hello Bjorn, 

the patches submitted in https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/29/85 have
not been objected by anyone, make the code simpler, and fix a 
current problem when using the "/sys/bus/pnp/devices/*/resources" 
interface.  I have been running them since at least Linux 3.0, 
with adapted changes in previous versions.  I have not seen any
regressions and I do not expect any regressions from these
patches. 

Bjorn had reviewed them and I am wondering what I can do to have 
them included in (one of) the next Linux kernel(s).

If there is any information that you need before an inclusion is
possible, just let me know. 

--- Witold

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-14 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-29 18:38 Witold Szczeponik
2012-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH V3 1/3] PNP: Simplify setting of resources Witold Szczeponik
2012-07-29 18:48 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] PNP: Allow resources to be set as disabled Witold Szczeponik
2012-07-29 18:49 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] PNP: Handle IORESOURCE_BITS in resource allocation Witold Szczeponik
2012-07-29 19:22 ` [PATCH V3 0/3] PNP: Allow PNP resources to be disabled (interface) Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-29 19:31   ` Witold Szczeponik
2012-07-30  8:28     ` Borislav Petkov
2012-07-30 10:58       ` Witold Szczeponik
2012-08-02 20:09       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-02 20:20         ` Witold Szczeponik
2012-08-02 21:40           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-02 21:57             ` Witold Szczeponik
2012-09-16 14:18             ` Witold Szczeponik
2012-09-18 21:42               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-03 15:57                 ` Witold Szczeponik
2012-10-14 15:57                   ` Witold Szczeponik [this message]
2012-10-19 19:02                 ` Witold Szczeponik
2012-10-19 22:19                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-02 16:32 Witold Szczeponik
2012-08-02 16:38 ` Witold Szczeponik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=507AE0D8.6090909@gmx.net \
    --to=witold.szczeponik@gmx.net \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome