From: "Maxim V. Patlasov" <mpatlasov@parallels.com>
To: "miklos@szeredi.hu" <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: "fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"devel@openvz.org" <devel@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] fuse: optimize scatter-gather direct IO
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 21:32:17 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <507D9A21.2070703@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120919161559.29482.55120.stgit@maximpc.sw.ru>
Hi Miklos,
09/19/2012 08:31 PM, Maxim Patlasov пишет:
> Hi,
>
> Existing fuse implementation processes scatter-gather direct IO in suboptimal
> way: fuse_direct_IO passes iovec[] to fuse_loop_dio and the latter calls
> fuse_direct_read/write for each iovec from iovec[] array. Thus we have as many
> submitted fuse-requests as the number of elements in iovec[] array. This is
> pure waste of resources and affects performance negatively especially for the
> case of many small chunks (e.g. page-size) packed in one iovec[] array.
>
> The patch-set amends situation in a natural way: let's simply pack as
> many iovec[] segments to every fuse-request as possible.
>
> To estimate performance improvement I used slightly modified fusexmp over
> tmpfs (clearing O_DIRECT bit from fi->flags in xmp_open). The test opened
> a file with O_DIRECT, then called readv/writev in a loop. An iovec[] for
> readv/writev consisted of 32 segments of 4K each. The throughput on some
> commodity (rather feeble) server was (in MB/sec):
>
> original / patched
> writev: ~107 / ~480
> readv: ~114 / ~569
>
> We're exploring possibility to use fuse for our own distributed storage
> implementation and big iovec[] arrays of many page-size chunks is typical
> use-case for device virtualization thread performing i/o on behalf of
> virtual-machine it serves.
>
> Changed in v2:
> - inline array of page pointers req->pages[] is replaced with dynamically
> allocated one; the number of elements is calculated a bit more
> intelligently than being equal to FUSE_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ; this is done
> for the sake of memory economy.
> - a dynamically allocated array of so-called 'page descriptors' - an offset
> in page plus the length of fragment - is added to fuse_req; this is done
> to simplify processing fuse requests covering several iov-s.
>
> Thanks,
> Maxim
>
> ---
>
> Maxim Patlasov (11):
> fuse: general infrastructure for pages[] of variable size
> fuse: categorize fuse_get_req()
> fuse: rework fuse_retrieve()
> fuse: rework fuse_readpages()
> fuse: rework fuse_perform_write()
> fuse: rework fuse_do_ioctl()
> fuse: add per-page descriptor <offset, length> to fuse_req
> fuse: use req->page_descs[] for argpages cases
> fuse: pass iov[] to fuse_get_user_pages()
> fuse: optimize fuse_get_user_pages()
> fuse: optimize __fuse_direct_io()
>
>
> fs/fuse/cuse.c | 3 -
> fs/fuse/dev.c | 96 ++++++++++++++-------
> fs/fuse/dir.c | 39 ++++----
> fs/fuse/file.c | 250 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 47 ++++++++--
> fs/fuse/inode.c | 6 +
> 6 files changed, 296 insertions(+), 145 deletions(-)
>
Any feedback on this patch-set (v2) would be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Maxim
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-16 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-19 16:31 Maxim Patlasov
2012-09-19 16:31 ` [PATCH 01/11] fuse: general infrastructure for pages[] of variable size Maxim Patlasov
2012-10-24 16:09 ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-09-19 16:31 ` [PATCH 02/11] fuse: categorize fuse_get_req() Maxim Patlasov
2012-10-24 16:26 ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-09-19 16:32 ` [PATCH 03/11] fuse: rework fuse_retrieve() Maxim Patlasov
2012-09-19 16:32 ` [PATCH 04/11] fuse: rework fuse_readpages() Maxim Patlasov
2012-09-19 16:32 ` [PATCH 05/11] fuse: rework fuse_perform_write() Maxim Patlasov
2012-09-19 16:32 ` [PATCH 06/11] fuse: rework fuse_do_ioctl() Maxim Patlasov
2012-09-19 16:32 ` [PATCH 07/11] fuse: add per-page descriptor <offset, length> to fuse_req Maxim Patlasov
2012-10-01 11:20 ` [PATCH 07/11] fuse: add per-page descriptor <offset, length> to fuse_req (v2) Maxim Patlasov
2012-10-25 13:24 ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-10-25 13:39 ` Maxim V. Patlasov
2012-09-19 16:33 ` [PATCH 08/11] fuse: use req->page_descs[] for argpages cases Maxim Patlasov
2012-10-25 14:05 ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-10-25 15:38 ` Maxim V. Patlasov
2012-09-19 16:33 ` [PATCH 09/11] fuse: pass iov[] to fuse_get_user_pages() Maxim Patlasov
2012-10-25 14:29 ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-09-19 16:33 ` [PATCH 10/11] fuse: optimize fuse_get_user_pages() Maxim Patlasov
2012-10-15 12:03 ` [PATCH 10/11] fuse: optimize fuse_get_user_pages() - v2 Maxim Patlasov
2012-10-25 14:50 ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-09-19 16:33 ` [PATCH 11/11] fuse: optimize __fuse_direct_io() Maxim Patlasov
2012-10-16 17:32 ` Maxim V. Patlasov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=507D9A21.2070703@parallels.com \
--to=mpatlasov@parallels.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome