From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tile: support GENERIC_KERNEL_THREAD and GENERIC_KERNEL_EXECVE
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:30:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5086D432.4070008@tilera.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121020171643.GU2616@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On 10/20/2012 1:16 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 04:34:01PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 09:06:57AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>>> First, the compat_sys_execve() declaration provided in
>>> arch/tile/include/asm/compat.h isn't right, so I deleted that (you had only
>>> deleted the PTREGS_SYSCALL trampoline declaration, _compat_sys_execve).
>>>
>>> However, then arch/tile/kernel/compat.c failed to build, because
>>> <linux/compat.h> is included before <asm/unistd.h>, and <asm/unistd.h>
>>> provides __ARCH_WANT_SYS_EXECVE, and so we end up with no declaration at
>>> all for compat_sys_execve. For most platforms this is no big deal, but on
>>> tile we use the __SYSCALL #define to provide the actual syscall table, and
>>> for that to work we need a declaration in scope for each syscall at the
>>> time we create the table.
>>>
>>> The best solution seems likely to be to copy the other place in
>>> <linux/compat.h> where we need to do something configurable (that is,
>>> CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_OLD_COMPAT_IPC), and just convert __ARCH_WANT_SYS_EXECVE
>>> to be a Kconfig option.
>> Frankly, I hope to get rid of the damn thing completely. By now we have
>> at least some variant of execve conversions for just about everything;
>> I certainly hope that by the beginning of the next cycle we'll have it
>> defined on everything. And put unconditional declarations in syscalls.h
>> and compat.h
>>
>> Actually, we can make the declaration in linux/compat.h unconditional
>> right now. The only obstacle is the situation on arm64; there the mainline
>> has C variant of that sucker (with struct pt_regs * in arguments) in
>> arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c. So we could ask Linus to pull
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cmarinas/linux-aarch64 execve
>> and then do the following in one patch:
>> introduce current_pt_regs() on tile (from your commit)
>> get rid of pt_regs * argument in tile compat_sys_execve(), making it
>> use current_pt_regs(); kill its wrapper
>> kill the declarations of compat_sys_execve()/_compat_sys_execve()
>> in tile asm/compat.h
>> make declaration in linux/compat.h unconditional
>> Note that this does *not* depend on kernel_thread/kernel_execve patch -
>> kernel_execve() is never going to hit compat_sys_execve(), since it's
>> only called from kernel threads and those are not going to be 32bit.
>> After that we can do kernel_thread/kernel_execve commit and
>> sys_execve() conversion with nothing outside of arch/tile touched.
> Another possible variant is for you to merge that branch from arm64 tree
> (only 3 commits it it) and then do as described above. I.e. on top of
> that apply the thing below, followed by your kernel_thread()/kernel_execve()
> patch (sans current_pt_regs() part), followed by obviously massaged parts
> of generic sys_execve for tile patch I've sent. FWIW, I've put the
> whole series (based at the end of arm64 branch) in signal.git#arch-tile.
> Comments?
I fetched the series from your arch-tile branch and built it, and it works
fine. It looks good from my inspection:
Acked-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
As you had suggested in an earlier email, I went ahead and eliminated the
special pt_regs handling for sigaltstack, rt_sigreturn, and clone. (Also a
tilepro-specific syscall that was also using PTREG_SYSCALL.) I'll send it
separately and you can include it in your tree if you like.
--
Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
http://www.tilera.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-23 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-16 22:35 new execve/kernel_thread design Al Viro
2012-10-17 5:32 ` Max Filippov
2012-10-17 5:43 ` Al Viro
2012-10-17 14:07 ` Jonas Bonn
2012-10-17 14:27 ` Michal Simek
2012-10-17 16:07 ` Al Viro
2012-10-17 16:19 ` Al Viro
2012-11-15 16:41 ` Michal Simek
2012-11-15 21:55 ` Al Viro
2012-11-16 7:59 ` Michal Simek
2012-11-18 5:45 ` sigaltstack fun (was Re: new execve/kernel_thread design) Al Viro
2012-11-18 18:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-18 19:03 ` sigaltstack fun David Miller
2012-11-18 19:59 ` Al Viro
2012-11-18 20:48 ` David Miller
2012-11-19 4:55 ` Greg KH
2012-11-18 21:02 ` Al Viro
2012-11-18 21:18 ` David Miller
2012-11-19 1:10 ` Al Viro
2012-11-19 1:30 ` David Miller
2012-11-19 2:35 ` Al Viro
2012-11-19 3:27 ` David Miller
2012-11-26 5:10 ` Al Viro
2012-11-26 5:15 ` Al Viro
2012-12-04 3:03 ` David Miller
2012-12-04 2:58 ` David Miller
2012-11-21 1:53 ` sigaltstack fun (was Re: new execve/kernel_thread design) Al Viro
2012-10-19 15:49 ` new execve/kernel_thread design Al Viro
2012-10-19 17:16 ` Luck, Tony
2012-10-19 17:30 ` Al Viro
2012-10-19 18:01 ` Tony Luck
2012-10-19 18:33 ` Al Viro
2012-10-19 20:25 ` [PATCH] tile: support GENERIC_KERNEL_THREAD and GENERIC_KERNEL_EXECVE Chris Metcalf
2012-10-19 21:35 ` Al Viro
2012-10-20 13:06 ` Chris Metcalf
2012-10-20 15:34 ` Al Viro
2012-10-20 17:16 ` Al Viro
2012-10-23 17:30 ` Chris Metcalf [this message]
2012-10-23 18:41 ` Al Viro
2012-10-23 19:22 ` Chris Metcalf
2012-10-23 20:36 ` Al Viro
2012-10-25 13:31 ` Chris Metcalf
2012-10-25 14:25 ` Al Viro
2012-10-23 20:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-10-23 20:51 ` Jeff King
2012-10-23 21:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-10-23 21:22 ` Jeff King
2012-10-24 11:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-10-23 21:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-10-23 21:47 ` Jeff King
2012-10-23 22:06 ` Marc Gauthier
2012-10-23 22:23 ` Jeff King
2012-10-24 6:02 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-10-24 1:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-10-24 1:56 ` Al Viro
2012-10-24 2:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-10-24 6:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-10-23 17:30 ` [PATCH] arch/tile: eliminate pt_regs trampolines for syscalls Chris Metcalf
2012-10-22 14:23 ` [PATCH] tile: support GENERIC_KERNEL_THREAD and GENERIC_KERNEL_EXECVE Catalin Marinas
2012-10-19 20:25 ` Chris Metcalf
2012-10-25 16:54 ` new execve/kernel_thread design Richard Kuo
2012-10-26 18:31 ` [update] " Al Viro
2012-10-27 3:32 ` Al Viro
2012-10-29 7:53 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-10-29 13:25 ` Al Viro
2012-10-29 14:38 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-10-29 14:57 ` Al Viro
2012-12-07 22:23 ` Al Viro
2012-12-08 2:40 ` Chris Metcalf
2012-12-13 1:54 ` Hirokazu Takata
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5086D432.4070008@tilera.com \
--to=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome