mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	"Bryan Schumaker" <bjschuma@netapp.com>,
	"Peng Tao" <bergwolf@gmail.com>,
	Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	"Toralf Förster" <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:30:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50884FF6.7030107@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878vavveee.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix>

On 10/24/2012 02:49 PM, Nix wrote:
> On 24 Oct 2012, Theodore Ts'o spake thusly:
>> Toralf, Nix, if you could try applying this patch (at the end of this
>> message), and let me know how and when the WARN_ON triggers, and if it
>> does, please send the empty_bug_workaround plus the WARN_ON(1) report.
>> I know about the case where a file system is mounted and then
>> immediately unmounted, but we don't think that's the problematic case.
>> If you see any other cases where WARN_ON is triggering, it would be
>> really good to know....
> 
> Confirmed, it triggers. Traceback below.
> 

<giant snip>

The warn on triggers, but I can't tell - did the corruption still occur
with Ted's patch?

-Eric

> 
> OK. That umount of local filesystems sprayed your added
> empty bug workaround and WARN_ONs so many times that nearly all of them
> scrolled off the screen -- and because syslogd was dead by now and this
> is where my netconsole logs go, they're lost. I suspect every single
> umounted filesystem sprayed one of these (and this happened long before
> any reboot-before-we're-done).
> 
> But I did the old trick of camera-capturing the last one (which was
> probably /boot, which has never got corrupted because I hardly ever
> write anything to it at all). I hope it's more useful than nothing. (I
> can rearrange things to umount /var last, and try again, if you think
> that a specific warning from an fs known to get corrupted is especially
> likely to be valuable.)
> 
> So I see, for one umount at least (and the chunk of the previous one
> that scrolled offscreen is consistent with this):
> 
> jbd2_mark_journal_empty bug workaround (21218, 21219)
> [obscured by light] at fs/jbd2/journal.c:1364 jbd2_mark_journal_empty+06c/0xbd
> ...
> [addresses omitted for sanity: traceback only]
> warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b
> warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
> jbd2_mark_journal_empty+06c/0xbd
> jbd2_journal_destroy+0x183/0x20c
> ? abort_exclusive_wait+0x8e/0x8e
> ext4_put_super+0x6c/0x316
> ? evict_inodes+0xe6/0xf1
> generic_shutdown_super+0x59/0xd1
> ? free_vfsmnt+0x18/0x3c
> kill_block_super+0x27/0x6a
> deactivate_locked_super+0x26/0x57
> deactivate_super+0x3f/0x43
> mntput_no_expire+0x134/0x13c
> sys_umount+0x308/0x33a
> system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-24 20:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-22 16:17 Heads-up: 3.6.2 / 3.6.3 NFS server panic: 3.6.2+ regression? Nix
2012-10-23  1:33 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-23 14:07   ` Nix
2012-10-23 14:30     ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-23 16:32       ` Heads-up: 3.6.2 / 3.6.3 NFS server oops: 3.6.2+ regression? (also an unrelated ext4 data loss bug) Nix
2012-10-23 16:46         ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-23 16:54           ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-23 16:56           ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-10-23 17:05             ` Nix
2012-10-23 17:36               ` Nix
2012-10-23 17:43                 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-10-23 17:44                 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-10-23 17:57                   ` Myklebust, Trond
     [not found]                   ` <1351015039.4622.23.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
2012-10-23 18:23                     ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-10-23 19:49                       ` Nix
2012-10-24 10:18                         ` [PATCH] lockd: fix races in per-net NSM client handling Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-10-23 20:57         ` Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?) Nix
2012-10-23 22:19           ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-23 22:47             ` Nix
2012-10-23 23:16               ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-23 23:06             ` Nix
2012-10-23 23:28               ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-23 23:34                 ` Nix
2012-10-24  0:57             ` Eric Sandeen
2012-10-24 20:17               ` Jan Kara
2012-10-26 15:25                 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-10-24 19:13             ` Jannis Achstetter
2012-10-24 21:31               ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-24 22:05                 ` Jannis Achstetter
2012-10-24 23:47                 ` Nix
2012-10-25 17:02                 ` Felipe Contreras
2012-10-24 21:04             ` Jannis Achstetter
2012-10-24  1:13           ` Eric Sandeen
2012-10-24  4:15             ` Nix
2012-10-24  4:27               ` Eric Sandeen
2012-10-24  5:23                 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-24  7:00                   ` Hugh Dickins
2012-10-24 11:46                     ` Nix
2012-10-24 11:45                   ` Nix
2012-10-24 17:22                   ` Eric Sandeen
2012-10-24 19:49                   ` Nix
2012-10-24 19:54                     ` Nix
2012-10-24 20:30                     ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2012-10-24 20:34                       ` Nix
2012-10-24 20:45                     ` Nix
2012-10-24 21:08                     ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-24 23:27                       ` Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6 (when rebooting during umount) Nix
2012-10-24 23:42                         ` Nix
2012-10-25  1:10                         ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-25  1:45                           ` Nix
2012-10-25 14:12                             ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-25 14:15                               ` Nix
2012-10-25 17:39                                 ` Nix
2012-10-25 11:06                           ` Nix
2012-10-26  0:22                           ` Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6 (when rebooting during umount) (possibly blockdev / arcmsr at fault??) Nix
2012-10-26  0:11               ` Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?) Ric Wheeler
2012-10-26  0:43                 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-26 12:12                   ` Nix
2012-10-26 20:35           ` Eric Sandeen
2012-10-26 20:37             ` Nix
2012-10-26 20:56               ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-26 20:59                 ` Nix
2012-10-26 21:15                   ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-26 21:19                     ` Nix
2012-10-27  0:22                       ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-27 12:45                         ` Nix
2012-10-27 17:55                           ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-27 18:47                             ` Nix
2012-10-27 21:19                               ` Eric Sandeen
2012-10-27 22:42                                 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-10-29  1:00                                   ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-29  1:04                                     ` Nix
2012-10-29  2:24                                     ` Eric Sandeen
2012-10-29  2:34                                       ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-29  2:35                                         ` Eric Sandeen
2012-10-29  2:42                                           ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-27 18:30                           ` Eric Sandeen
2012-10-27  3:11                     ` Jim Rees
2012-10-28  4:23           ` [PATCH] ext4: fix unjournaled inode bitmap modification Eric Sandeen
2012-10-28 13:59             ` Nix
2012-10-29  2:30             ` [PATCH -v3] " Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-29  3:24               ` Eric Sandeen
2012-10-29 17:08               ` Darrick J. Wong
     [not found] <jXsTo-5lW-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <jXBDk-7vn-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <jXNl8-5m5-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <jXNOa-5MR-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <jXPGh-87s-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]         ` <jXTJW-4CH-55@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]           ` <jXUZj-6mo-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]             ` <jXVLH-7kO-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]               ` <jXW53-7CC-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]                 ` <jXWeJ-7Lk-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2012-10-24 17:38                   ` Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?) Martin
2012-10-26 20:13                     ` Martin
2012-10-26 20:24                       ` Nix
2012-10-26 20:44                         ` Martin
2012-10-26 20:47                           ` Nix
2012-10-26 21:10                       ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-26 23:15                         ` Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50884FF6.7030107@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=bergwolf@gmail.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=bjschuma@netapp.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nix@esperi.org.uk \
    --cc=toralf.foerster@gmx.de \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome