From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"sameo@linux.intel.com" <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "grant.likely@secretlab.ca" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
"linus.walleij@linaro.org" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: Convert tps6586x to irq_domain
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:18:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <508FB063.70206@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121009064011.GQ8237@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Hi Mark/Samuel,
There is one more change for doing cleanups in regulator parsing where I
moved the regulator parsing from mfd to regulator driver:
[PATCH] mfd: tps6586x: move regulator dt parsing to regulator driver
Although this series and above change is independent but I like to go
these in same branch to avoid the merge conflict.
If this is fine to go in same branch theb I can create a new series of
these 3 changes and above change.
These series is already reviewed by Mark.
Please let me know your opinion.
Thanks,
Laxman
On Tuesday 09 October 2012 12:10 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 11:34:47AM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
>> The bit definitions are also different in status and mask register
>> and yes, this will be again problem as we do in isr thread
>> data->status_buf[i]&= ~data->mask_buf[i];
>> So given the constraint, generic will not work here.
> OK, that's a good reason not to use the generic code.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-30 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-08 16:13 [PATCH 0/3] mfd: tps6586x: Convert to irq domain Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-08 16:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] mfd: Convert tps6586x to irq_domain Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-09 6:06 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-09 5:48 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-09 6:23 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-09 6:04 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-09 6:40 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-30 10:46 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-30 10:48 ` Laxman Dewangan [this message]
2012-10-08 16:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] mfd: tps6586x: add irq io-resource for rtc sub driver Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-09 6:07 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-08 16:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] mfd: tps6586x: implement gpio_to_irq Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-09 6:07 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-10 7:49 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=508FB063.70206@nvidia.com \
--to=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome